Suppr超能文献

一项随机试验,旨在研究甘精胰岛素在接受强化监护的高血糖急性脑卒中患者中的疗效和安全性。

A randomized trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine in hyperglycemic acute stroke patients receiving intensive care.

机构信息

Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10055, Taiwan.

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10055, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 1;11(1):11523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91036-2.

Abstract

This pilot, randomized, open-label controlled study compared the basal-bolus regimens of insulin glargine (IG) and neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in stroke patients with hyperglycemia receiving intensive care. The study recruited acute stroke patients requiring intensive care within 72 h (h) of onset and had blood glucose > 200 mg/dL. 50 patients received IG (n = 26) or NPH (n = 24) with added short-acting prandial regular insulin over a 72-h period. The primary end point was the percentage of glucose within 80-180 mg/dL assessed through continuous glucose monitoring. The baseline characteristics were comparable, except the IG had higher glucose pre-randomization than the NPH (290.69 ± 82.31 vs. 246.04 ± 41.76 mg/dL, P = 0.021). The percentage of time with glucose between 80 and 180 mg/dL was 45.88 ± 27.04% in the IG and 53.56 ± 22.89% in the NPH (P = 0.341) and the percentage of glucose reduction was 31.47 ± 17.52% in the IG and 27.28 ± 14.56% in the NPH (P = 0.374). The percentage of time with glucose < 60 mg/dL was 0.14 ± 0.49% in the IG and 0.47 ± 1.74% in the NPH. Poststroke outcomes were not significantly different. In conclusion, IG is safe and equally effective as an NPH-based basal-bolus regimen for acute stroke patients with hyperglycemia receiving intensive care.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02607943. Registered 18/11/2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02607943 .

摘要

这项先导性、随机、开放性标签对照研究比较了胰岛素甘精(IG)和中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)胰岛素在接受强化护理的伴有高血糖的脑卒中患者中的基础-餐时胰岛素给药方案。该研究纳入了发病后 72 小时内需要强化护理的急性脑卒中患者,且其血糖>200mg/dL。50 例患者在 72 小时内分别接受了胰岛素甘精(n=26)或中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(n=24)治疗,并同时给予速效餐时常规胰岛素。主要终点是通过连续血糖监测评估的 80-180mg/dL 范围内的血糖百分比。基线特征具有可比性,除了 IG 组的随机化前血糖高于 NPH 组(290.69±82.31 比 246.04±41.76mg/dL,P=0.021)。IG 组的血糖在 80-180mg/dL 范围内的时间百分比为 45.88±27.04%,NPH 组为 53.56±22.89%(P=0.341),IG 组的血糖降低百分比为 31.47±17.52%,NPH 组为 27.28±14.56%(P=0.374)。IG 组的血糖<60mg/dL 的时间百分比为 0.14±0.49%,NPH 组为 0.47±1.74%。脑卒中后结局无显著差异。总之,IG 对于接受强化护理的伴有高血糖的急性脑卒中患者而言是安全且与基于 NPH 的基础-餐时胰岛素给药方案等效的。

试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02607943。注册于 2015 年 11 月 18 日,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02607943。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fba1/8169927/766400c953f4/41598_2021_91036_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验