Suppr超能文献

一家大型教学医院头孢曲松/头孢噻肟替换方案的结果

Outcome of a ceftriaxone/cefotaxime interchange programme in a major teaching hospital.

作者信息

Gutensohn A, Bunz D, Frighetto L, Jewesson P

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Vancouver General Hospital, B.C. Canada.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1991;37 Suppl 3:15-21. doi: 10.1159/000238928.

Abstract

A two-stage intervention programme was performed to enable the effective substitution of ceftriaxone for cefotaxime in a teaching hospital with large numbers of transient prescribers. One hundred and sixteen patients with a variety of bacterial infections were randomized to an open, historical control comparative study to determine if ceftriaxone was an acceptable replacement for cefotaxime. For 6 months prior to the intervention, both cephalosporins were available on formulary. Following an initial informational stage, a therapeutic interchange programme was implemented to convert prescriptions for cefotaxime to ceftriaxone. Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime were equivalent in terms of microbiological and clinical efficacy and patient tolerance in 77 evaluable patients. No changes in prescriber service occurred after the changeover. Post-intervention treatment courses required a ceftriaxone/cefotaxime interchange in 28% of the cases. Ceftriaxone appeared to be a suitable and cost-effective alternative to cefotaxime in this hospital. The intervention programme successfully invoked the formulary change with minimal expense and prescriber opposition.

摘要

在一家有大量临时开方人员的教学医院,实施了一项两阶段干预计划,以实现用头孢曲松有效替代头孢噻肟。116例患有各种细菌感染的患者被随机分配到一项开放的、历史性对照比较研究中,以确定头孢曲松是否是头孢噻肟的可接受替代药物。在干预前的6个月里,两种头孢菌素都在处方集上可用。在初始信息阶段之后,实施了一项治疗性药物互换计划,将头孢噻肟的处方转换为头孢曲松。在77例可评估患者中,头孢曲松和头孢噻肟在微生物学和临床疗效以及患者耐受性方面相当。转换后开方人员的服务没有变化。干预后的治疗疗程中,28%的病例需要进行头孢曲松/头孢噻肟的互换。在这家医院,头孢曲松似乎是头孢噻肟的一种合适且具有成本效益的替代药物。该干预计划以最小的费用和开方人员的反对成功实现了处方集的更改。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验