两种抗生素治疗方案在侵袭性牙周炎中的应用:临床参数和龈沟液生物标志物变化的比较

The use of 2 antibiotic regimens in aggressive periodontitis: comparison of changes in clinical parameters and gingival crevicular fluid biomarkers.

作者信息

Machtei Eli E, Younis Mahmoud N

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Oral, and Dental Medicine, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2008 Nov;39(10):811-9.

DOI:
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy in conjunction with 2 different antibacterial agents on clinical and immunological parameters in aggressive periodontitis (AgP) patients.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Thirty-one AgP patients underwent clinical examination that included plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL). GCF (gingival crevicular fluid) samples were collected and assayed for PGE(2), IL-1beta, and TNFalpha. Nonsurgical periodontal therapy was performed. The patients received doxycycline (doxy group) or metronidazole plus amoxicillin (am-met group). After completion of the mechanical phase of therapy, patients were seen biweekly for oral hygiene reinforcement. After 12 weeks, clinical measurements and GCF sampling were repeated.

RESULTS

The combined mechanical and antimicrobial therapy resulted in overall improvement in all clinical parameters; mean PPD reduction of 0.74 +/- 0.1 mm and mean CAL gain 0.86 +/- 0.1 mm were both statistically significant (P = .0001). Marked reduction was observed for PGE2 and IL-1beta, but not TNFalpha. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups at baseline or final examination, except for PGE(2) at final examination: It was significantly lower for the doxy group (83.61 +/- 5.8 ng) than for the am-met group (124.08 +/- 15.8 ng), P = .0202.

CONCLUSION

Both treatment protocols resulted in significant improvements in the clinical and immunological parameters. When combined mechanical and antimicrobial protocol is desired and microbial cultures are not available, the use of both antibiotic regimens is recommended; the treatment of choice should be based on compliance, allergies, and potential side effects.

摘要

目的

评估并比较非手术牙周治疗联合两种不同抗菌药物对侵袭性牙周炎(AgP)患者临床和免疫参数的影响。

方法与材料

31例AgP患者接受了临床检查,包括菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、探诊深度(PPD)和临床附着水平(CAL)。收集龈沟液(GCF)样本并检测前列腺素E2(PGE2)、白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)。进行了非手术牙周治疗。患者接受强力霉素(强力霉素组)或甲硝唑加阿莫西林(甲硝-阿莫西林组)治疗。在治疗的机械阶段完成后,每两周对患者进行一次口腔卫生强化指导。12周后,重复进行临床测量和GCF采样。

结果

机械治疗与抗菌治疗相结合使所有临床参数总体得到改善;平均PPD降低0.74±0.1mm,平均CAL增加0.86±0.1mm,均具有统计学意义(P = 0.0001)。观察到PGE2和IL-1β显著降低,但TNFα未降低。两组在基线或最终检查时无显著差异,但最终检查时的PGE2除外:强力霉素组(83.61±5.8ng)显著低于甲硝-阿莫西林组(124.08±15.8ng),P = 0.0202。

结论

两种治疗方案均使临床和免疫参数得到显著改善。当需要联合机械和抗菌方案且无法进行微生物培养时,建议使用两种抗生素方案;治疗选择应基于依从性、过敏情况和潜在副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索