Kötter I
Bereich Rheumatologie, Medizinische Universitätsklinik Abt. II,Hämatologie, Onkologie, Immunologie, Rheumatologie, Pulmologie, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen.
Z Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;68(2):157-61. doi: 10.1007/s00393-008-0407-1.
The aim of the EULAR/ESCISIT initiative was to develop evidence-based recommendations for the management of Behçet's disease (BD), supplemented where necessary by expert opinions and taking already published data into consideration. The current article briefly summarises the results in German and comments on them.
The multidisciplinary expert committee consisted of nine rheumatologists, three ophthalmologists, one internist, one dermatologist, and one neurologist, representing six European countries, Tunisia and Korea. One patient representative was also present. Problem areas and related keywords for a systematic literature search were identified. A systematic literature research was performed using MedLine and the Cochrane library up to December 2006. Consequently, 40 initial statements were generated based on the literature research. These yielded the final recommendations which resulted from two blind Delphi rounds of voting.
Nine recommendations were developed for the management of different aspects of BD. The strength of each recommendation was determined by the level of evidence and the expert's opinions. The level of agreement for each recommendation was determined using a visual analogue scale for both the whole committee and for each individual viewpoint of the subgroup, who considered themselves experts in that field of BD. There was excellent concordance between the level of agreement of the whole group and the "experts in the field".
Recommendations relating to eye, skin, and mucosal disease, as well as arthritis are mainly evidence-based, while recommendations on vascular disease and neurological and gastrointestinal involvement are based largely on expert opinions and uncontrolled evidence from open trials and observational studies. The need for further properly designed controlled clinical trials is apparent.
欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)/欧洲白塞病研究与治疗国际协作组(ESCISIT)计划的目的是制定基于证据的白塞病(BD)管理建议,必要时辅以专家意见,并考虑已发表的数据。本文简要总结了德语版的结果并加以评论。
多学科专家委员会由9名风湿病学家、3名眼科医生、1名内科医生、1名皮肤科医生和1名神经科医生组成,代表六个欧洲国家、突尼斯和韩国。还有一名患者代表。确定了系统文献检索的问题领域和相关关键词。截至2006年12月,使用MedLine和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统文献检索。因此,基于文献检索生成了40条初始陈述。这些陈述产生了最终建议,这些建议来自两轮盲法德尔菲投票。
针对BD不同方面的管理制定了九条建议。每条建议的力度由证据水平和专家意见决定。使用视觉模拟量表确定整个委员会以及亚组中每个个体观点(他们认为自己是BD该领域的专家)对每条建议的一致程度。整个小组的一致程度与“该领域专家”之间存在极好的一致性。
关于眼部、皮肤和黏膜疾病以及关节炎的建议主要基于证据,而关于血管疾病以及神经和胃肠道受累的建议很大程度上基于专家意见以及开放试验和观察性研究的非对照证据。显然需要进一步开展设计合理的对照临床试验。