Sherwood David E
Department of Integrative Physiology, Campus Box 354, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-03544, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Oct;107(2):353-64. doi: 10.2466/pms.107.2.353-364.
One of the major issues to emerge from research on human-limb movement is the manner in which the central nervous system regulates electromyographic (EMG) activity to produce movements that differ in duration and distance. Different models of control predict different relations between EMG characteristics and movement kinematics, particularly with regard to the role of EMG burst duration and movement time. However, models have been evaluated with means averaged over individuals and across large numbers of practice trials. The goal of this study was to assess how well individual subjects' data conform to the predictions of the control models. Participants (n = 4) performed an elbow flexion and extension task over 45 degrees in movement times between 90 and 260 msec. EMG amplitude and EMG burst duration from the right elbow flexors were correlated with movement time for each individual. As expected, movement time was positively correlated with EMG burst duration and negatively correlated with EMG amplitude, with wider ranges in the EMG burst duration-movement time correlations across participants. Data from all participants supported predictions of the impulse-timing control model, but the slopes of the studied relations varied across participants.
人类肢体运动研究中出现的一个主要问题是中枢神经系统调节肌电图(EMG)活动以产生持续时间和距离不同的运动的方式。不同的控制模型预测了EMG特征与运动运动学之间的不同关系,特别是关于EMG爆发持续时间和运动时间的作用。然而,模型是通过对个体和大量练习试验的平均值进行评估的。本研究的目的是评估个体受试者的数据与控制模型预测的符合程度。参与者(n = 4)在90至260毫秒的运动时间内进行了45度的肘部屈伸任务。对每个个体,右肘屈肌的EMG幅度和EMG爆发持续时间与运动时间相关。正如预期的那样,运动时间与EMG爆发持续时间呈正相关,与EMG幅度呈负相关,参与者之间EMG爆发持续时间与运动时间的相关性范围更广。所有参与者的数据都支持脉冲定时控制模型的预测,但所研究关系的斜率在参与者之间有所不同。