Helminiak Daniel A
Department of Psychology, University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA 30118, USA.
J Relig Health. 2008 Dec;47(4):526-40. doi: 10.1007/s10943-008-9173-2.
Presuming Rayburn's (2006: Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 28, 86-92) review of (Paloutzian and Park's, (2005, New York: The Guilford Press) [corrected] Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality [corrected] and sketching an alternative paradigm, this review focuses on the Handbook's virtual conflation of religion and spirituality; relates this conflation to the hegemony of Protestant theology in North American psychology of religion; highlights the Handbook's lack of attention to [corrected] spirituality per se, which--if [corrected] not inseparably linked with theism, but, rather, [corrected] related to the self-transcending, meaning-making dimension of the human mind--could [corrected] provide an explanatory breakthrough in the field of the psychology of religion and of the social sciences overall; and sees Handbook's advocacy for a "multilevel interdisciplinary paradigm" as a regrettable acceptance of the failed, long-term strategy of the field of psychology in general.
基于雷伯恩(2006年:《儿童与家庭行为疗法》,第28卷,第86 - 92页)对(帕洛齐安和帕克的,(2005年,纽约:吉尔福德出版社)[修订版]《宗教与灵性心理学手册》[修订版]的综述,并勾勒出一种替代范式,本综述聚焦于该手册中宗教与灵性的实际混淆;将这种混淆与新教神学在北美宗教心理学中的霸权联系起来;强调该手册对灵性本身缺乏关注,而灵性——如果与有神论并非不可分割地联系在一起,而是与人类思维的自我超越、意义建构维度相关——可能会在宗教心理学乃至整个社会科学领域带来解释性的突破;并认为该手册对“多层次跨学科范式”的倡导是对整个心理学领域长期失败策略的令人遗憾的接受。