Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Tallián Gy. 20-32, 7400, Kaposvár, Somogy County, Hungary.
J Relig Health. 2024 Feb;63(1):46-62. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01888-3. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
Theological perspectives have been given short shrift in the literature on religion and health research. This study demonstrates how including different schools of mainline Western Protestant theological thought (evolutionist, correlationist, and dialectical) in the scientific process could contribute to clarifying controversies. The issue is not just theoretical: Theology can even challenge assumptions on elicitability and reproducibility. Theology perceives spirituality as a dialogue with the Total Other, thus making each encounter with the transcendent (not just the individuality of the person) unique and unpredictable. By accepting setbacks on a journey with wide-ranging aspirations, theology redefines health as the momentum of constant striving toward the divine spirit. Since these theological insights relate to interventions that affect patients' intimacy, attempting to recognize the (albeit implicit) spiritual-theological standpoint of the patient and the self-and how these relate to authentic traditions of spirituality-appears to be an essential prerequisite for ethical spiritual intervention.
宗教与健康研究的文献中,神学视角一直被忽视。本研究展示了将主流西方新教神学思想的不同流派(进化论、关联论和辩证论)纳入科学过程如何有助于澄清争议。问题不仅是理论上的:神学甚至可以挑战可引出性和可再现性的假设。神学将灵性视为与整体他者的对话,从而使与超越者的每次相遇(不仅仅是个人的独特性)都是独特且不可预测的。通过接受充满远大抱负的旅程中的挫折,神学将健康重新定义为不断向神圣精神努力的动力。由于这些神学见解与影响患者亲密关系的干预措施有关,因此试图认识到(即使是隐含的)患者和自我的精神-神学立场,以及这些立场如何与真正的灵性传统相关,似乎是进行伦理精神干预的必要前提。