Suppr超能文献

两种螺钉植入方式的生物力学比较

A biomechanical comparison of two patterns of screw insertion.

作者信息

Lichtblau Sheldon, Gallina Jessica, Nasser Philip, Munyoki Musyoka, Jepsen Karl

机构信息

Peter and Leni May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(4):269-71.

Abstract

Inserting a screw into a long bone introduces a stress riser that can predispose the bone to fracture. Where multiple screws are inserted this vulnerability may be increased. It is thought that the pattern of screw insertion plays an important part in determining the susceptibility of the bone to stress fracture. In order to study the importance of pattern of screw insertion, third generation composite femora with cannulated screws inserted in two different patterns were tested to failure by a servohydraulic materials test system. The vertical pattern of screw insertion is less apt to predispose a long bone to subsequent fracture than a horizontal pattern.

摘要

将螺钉插入长骨会引入应力集中源,这可能使骨骼易于发生骨折。在多处插入多枚螺钉时,这种易损性可能会增加。据认为,螺钉插入方式在决定骨骼对应力性骨折的易感性方面起着重要作用。为了研究螺钉插入方式的重要性,使用伺服液压材料测试系统对采用两种不同方式插入空心螺钉的第三代复合股骨进行测试直至失效。与水平插入方式相比,垂直插入螺钉的方式使长骨随后发生骨折的可能性更小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验