• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对身体威胁的视觉呈现是否会引发触觉加工偏向?观看威胁性图片所诱发的特定感觉通道的注意促进作用。

Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.

作者信息

Van Damme Stefaan, Gallace Alberto, Spence Charles, Crombez Geert, Moseley G Lorimer

机构信息

Ghent University, Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Henri Dunantlaan 2, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2009 Feb 9;1253:100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.072. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.072
PMID:19094970
Abstract

Threatening stimuli are thought to bias spatial attention toward the location from which the threat is presented. Although this effect is well-established in the visual domain, little is known regarding whether tactile attention is similarly affected by threatening pictures. We hypothesised that tactile attention might be more affected by cues implying physical threat to a person's bodily tissues than by cues implying general threat. In the present study, participants made temporal order judgments (TOJs) concerning which of a pair of tactile (or auditory) stimuli, one presented to either hand, at a range of inter-stimulus intervals, had been presented first. A picture (showing physical threat, general threat, or no threat) was presented in front of one or the other hand shortly before the tactile stimuli. The results revealed that tactile attention was biased toward the side on which the picture was presented, and that this effect was significantly larger for physical threat pictures than for general threat or neutral pictures. By contrast, the bias in auditory attention toward the side of the picture was significantly larger for general threat pictures than for physical threat pictures or neutral pictures. These findings therefore demonstrate a modality-specific effect of physically threatening cues on the processing of tactile stimuli, and of generally threatening cues on auditory information processing. These results demonstrate that the processing of tactile information from the body part closest to the threatening stimulus is prioritized over tactile information from elsewhere on the body.

摘要

威胁性刺激被认为会使空间注意力偏向威胁呈现的位置。尽管这种效应在视觉领域已得到充分证实,但对于威胁性图片是否同样会影响触觉注意力,人们却知之甚少。我们假设,与暗示一般威胁的线索相比,暗示对人的身体组织构成身体威胁的线索可能对触觉注意力的影响更大。在本研究中,参与者对一对触觉(或听觉)刺激(分别呈现给两只手)中的哪一个先呈现进行时间顺序判断(TOJ),刺激间隔范围不同。在触觉刺激前不久,在一只手或另一只手的前方呈现一幅图片(显示身体威胁、一般威胁或无威胁)。结果显示,触觉注意力偏向图片呈现的一侧,并且这种效应在身体威胁图片中比在一般威胁或中性图片中显著更大。相比之下,一般威胁图片使听觉注意力偏向图片一侧的偏差比身体威胁图片或中性图片显著更大。因此,这些发现证明了身体威胁线索对触觉刺激处理以及一般威胁线索对听觉信息处理具有特定模态的影响。这些结果表明,来自最接近威胁性刺激的身体部位的触觉信息处理优先于来自身体其他部位的触觉信息。

相似文献

1
Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.对身体威胁的视觉呈现是否会引发触觉加工偏向?观看威胁性图片所诱发的特定感觉通道的注意促进作用。
Brain Res. 2009 Feb 9;1253:100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.072. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
2
The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.视觉威胁对触觉空间注意力的影响。
Cognition. 2007 Mar;102(3):405-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
3
Concurrent emotional pictures modulate temporal order judgments of spatially separated audio-tactile stimuli.同时呈现的情绪图片会影响空间分离的视听刺激的时间顺序判断。
Brain Res. 2013 Nov 6;1537:156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
4
Somatoform dissociation and somatosensory amplification are differentially associated with attention to the tactile modality following exposure to body-related stimuli.躯体形式解离和躯体感觉放大与接触身体相关刺激后对触觉模态的注意力存在差异关联。
J Psychosom Res. 2007 Feb;62(2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.08.008.
5
Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.使用非空间辨别任务研究触觉反射性注意的时间进程。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jun;128(2):210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.12.010. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
6
Audiotactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind individuals.视力正常者和盲人的听觉触觉时间顺序判断
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Sep;46(11):2845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
7
Audiotactile temporal order judgments.听觉触觉时间顺序判断
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Mar;118(3):277-91. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.017. Epub 2004 Dec 9.
8
Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance.高特质焦虑中对威胁的注意偏向成分:促进性参与、脱逸受损和注意回避。
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Dec;44(12):1757-71. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.011. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
9
An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.一项关于个人周边空间和个人外部空间中视觉触觉交互作用的事件相关电位研究:空间规则的证据
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1550-9. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21109.
10
Capture of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion by moving and static sound.通过移动和静态声音捕获多模态视觉/触觉表观运动
Seeing Perceiving. 2011;24(4):369-89. doi: 10.1163/187847511X584434.

引用本文的文献

1
Body ownership and tactile processing: Effects of bilateral rubber hand illusion on tactile temporal order judgment.身体所有权与触觉加工:双侧橡皮手错觉对触觉时间顺序判断的影响
Iperception. 2024 Dec 23;15(6):20416695241308146. doi: 10.1177/20416695241308146. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
2
Altered representation of peripersonal and interpersonal space in psychopathology.精神病理学中个体空间和人际空间的表象改变。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Dec;114:102509. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102509. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
3
Self-other boundary under social threat in schizophrenia.
精神分裂症患者在社会威胁下的自我-他人边界
Schizophr Res. 2024 Dec;274:182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.09.018. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
High cognitive load enhances the susceptibility to non-speech audiovisual illusions.高认知负荷增强了对非言语视听错觉的易感性。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 1;8(1):11530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30007-6.
5
Frontier of Self and Impact Prediction.自我与影响预测前沿
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 27;9:1073. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01073. eCollection 2018.
6
No perceptual prioritization of non-nociceptive vibrotactile and visual stimuli presented on a sensitized body part.致敏身体部位上呈现的非伤害性振动触觉和视觉刺激无感知优先化。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 29;8(1):5359. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23135-6.
7
Do patients with chronic unilateral orofacial pain due to a temporomandibular disorder show increased attending to somatosensory input at the painful side of the jaw?因颞下颌关节紊乱导致慢性单侧口面部疼痛的患者,其下颌疼痛侧对躯体感觉输入的注意力是否增加?
PeerJ. 2018 Jan 24;6:e4310. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4310. eCollection 2018.
8
Attention to pain! A neurocognitive perspective on attentional modulation of pain in neuroimaging studies.关注疼痛!神经影像学研究中疼痛的注意调节的神经认知视角。
Cortex. 2017 Apr;89:120-134. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
9
No Evidence for Threat-Induced Spatial Prioritization of Somatosensory Stimulation during Pain Control Using a Synchrony Judgment Paradigm.在使用同步判断范式进行疼痛控制期间,没有证据表明威胁会导致体感刺激的空间优先化。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 7;11(6):e0156648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156648. eCollection 2016.
10
Approaching threat modulates visuotactile interactions in peripersonal space.接近威胁会调节个人周边空间中的视觉触觉交互。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jul;234(7):1875-1884. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4571-2. Epub 2016 Feb 19.