Van Damme Stefaan, Gallace Alberto, Spence Charles, Crombez Geert, Moseley G Lorimer
Ghent University, Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Henri Dunantlaan 2, Ghent, Belgium.
Brain Res. 2009 Feb 9;1253:100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.072. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
Threatening stimuli are thought to bias spatial attention toward the location from which the threat is presented. Although this effect is well-established in the visual domain, little is known regarding whether tactile attention is similarly affected by threatening pictures. We hypothesised that tactile attention might be more affected by cues implying physical threat to a person's bodily tissues than by cues implying general threat. In the present study, participants made temporal order judgments (TOJs) concerning which of a pair of tactile (or auditory) stimuli, one presented to either hand, at a range of inter-stimulus intervals, had been presented first. A picture (showing physical threat, general threat, or no threat) was presented in front of one or the other hand shortly before the tactile stimuli. The results revealed that tactile attention was biased toward the side on which the picture was presented, and that this effect was significantly larger for physical threat pictures than for general threat or neutral pictures. By contrast, the bias in auditory attention toward the side of the picture was significantly larger for general threat pictures than for physical threat pictures or neutral pictures. These findings therefore demonstrate a modality-specific effect of physically threatening cues on the processing of tactile stimuli, and of generally threatening cues on auditory information processing. These results demonstrate that the processing of tactile information from the body part closest to the threatening stimulus is prioritized over tactile information from elsewhere on the body.
威胁性刺激被认为会使空间注意力偏向威胁呈现的位置。尽管这种效应在视觉领域已得到充分证实,但对于威胁性图片是否同样会影响触觉注意力,人们却知之甚少。我们假设,与暗示一般威胁的线索相比,暗示对人的身体组织构成身体威胁的线索可能对触觉注意力的影响更大。在本研究中,参与者对一对触觉(或听觉)刺激(分别呈现给两只手)中的哪一个先呈现进行时间顺序判断(TOJ),刺激间隔范围不同。在触觉刺激前不久,在一只手或另一只手的前方呈现一幅图片(显示身体威胁、一般威胁或无威胁)。结果显示,触觉注意力偏向图片呈现的一侧,并且这种效应在身体威胁图片中比在一般威胁或中性图片中显著更大。相比之下,一般威胁图片使听觉注意力偏向图片一侧的偏差比身体威胁图片或中性图片显著更大。因此,这些发现证明了身体威胁线索对触觉刺激处理以及一般威胁线索对听觉信息处理具有特定模态的影响。这些结果表明,来自最接近威胁性刺激的身体部位的触觉信息处理优先于来自身体其他部位的触觉信息。