Suppr超能文献

使用每分钟发射240次冲击波的临床双头碎石机评估肾损伤。

Assessment of renal injury with a clinical dual head lithotriptor delivering 240 shock waves per minute.

作者信息

Handa Rajash K, McAteer James A, Evan Andrew P, Connors Bret A, Pishchalnikov Yuri A, Gao Sujuan

机构信息

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology,Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):884-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.065. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Lithotriptors with 2 treatment heads deliver shock waves along separate paths. Firing 1 head and then the other in alternating mode has been suggested as a strategy to treat stones twice as rapidly as with conventional shock wave lithotripsy. Because the shock wave rate is known to have a role in shock wave lithotripsy induced injury, and given that treatment using 2 separate shock wave sources exposes more renal tissue to shock wave energy than treatment with a conventional lithotriptor, we assessed renal trauma in pigs following treatment at rapid rate (240 shock waves per minute and 120 shock waves per minute per head) using a Duet lithotriptor (Direx Medical Systems, Petach Tikva, Israel) fired in alternating mode.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight adult female pigs (Hardin Farms, Danville, Indiana) each were treated with sham shock wave lithotripsy or 2,400 shock waves delivered in alternating mode (1,200 shock waves per head, 120 shock waves per minute per head and 240 shock waves per minute overall at a power level of 10) to the lower renal pole. Renal functional parameters, including glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow, were determined before and 1 hour after shock wave lithotripsy. The kidneys were perfusion fixed in situ and the hemorrhagic lesion was quantified as a percent of functional renal volume.

RESULTS

Shock wave treatment resulted in no significant change in renal function and the response was similar to the functional response seen in sham shock wave treated animals. In 6 pigs treated with alternating mode the renal lesion was small at a mean +/- SEM of 0.22% +/- 0.09% of functional renal volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney tissue and function were minimally affected by a clinical dose of shock waves delivered in alternating mode (120 shock waves per minute per head and 240 shock waves per minute overall) with a Duet lithotriptor. These observations decrease concern that dual head lithotripsy at a rapid rate is inherently dangerous.

摘要

目的

具有两个治疗头的碎石机沿不同路径发射冲击波。有人提出以交替模式先发射一个治疗头然后再发射另一个治疗头,作为一种比传统冲击波碎石术快两倍治疗结石的策略。由于已知冲击波频率在冲击波碎石术所致损伤中起作用,且鉴于使用两个独立冲击波源进行治疗比使用传统碎石机使更多肾组织暴露于冲击波能量下,我们使用以交替模式发射的Duet碎石机(以色列佩塔提克瓦Direx医疗系统公司),以快速频率(每分钟240次冲击波,每个治疗头每分钟120次冲击波)对猪进行治疗后评估肾损伤情况。

材料与方法

8只成年雌性猪(印第安纳州丹维尔哈丁农场),每只均接受假冲击波碎石术,或以交替模式(每个治疗头1200次冲击波,每个治疗头每分钟120次冲击波,总体每分钟240次冲击波,功率水平为10)向下肾极发射2400次冲击波。在冲击波碎石术前及术后1小时测定肾功能参数,包括肾小球滤过率和有效肾血浆流量。将肾脏原位灌注固定,将出血性病变量化为功能性肾体积的百分比。

结果

冲击波治疗后肾功能无显著变化,其反应与假冲击波治疗动物所见的功能反应相似。在6只接受交替模式治疗的猪中,肾损伤较小,平均占功能性肾体积的0.22%±0.09%(均值±标准误)。

结论

使用Duet碎石机以交替模式(每个治疗头每分钟120次冲击波,总体每分钟240次冲击波)发射临床剂量的冲击波对肾组织和功能影响极小。这些观察结果减轻了对快速进行双头碎石术存在固有危险的担忧。

相似文献

1
Assessment of renal injury with a clinical dual head lithotriptor delivering 240 shock waves per minute.
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):884-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.065. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
3
Evaluation of shock wave lithotripsy injury in the pig using a narrow focal zone lithotriptor.
BJU Int. 2012 Nov;110(9):1376-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11160.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
4
Dual-head lithotripsy in synchronous mode: acute effect on renal function and morphology in the pig.
BJU Int. 2007 May;99(5):1134-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06736.x. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
7
Dual pulse shock wave lithotripsy: in vitro and in vivo study.
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2388-92. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000180416.03512.24.
10
Prevention of lithotripsy-induced renal injury by pretreating kidneys with low-energy shock waves.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Mar;17(3):663-73. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005060634. Epub 2006 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
How to maximize the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy.
Turk J Urol. 2020 Nov;46(Supp. 1):S19-S26. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20441. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
2
Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):E1167-75. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319203111. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: An opinion on its future.
Indian J Urol. 2014 Jan;30(1):73-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.124211.
5
Evaluation of shock wave lithotripsy injury in the pig using a narrow focal zone lithotriptor.
BJU Int. 2012 Nov;110(9):1376-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11160.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
6
Shock wave technology and application: an update.
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):784-96. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.033. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
7
Novel instrumentation in urologic surgery: Shock wave lithotripsy.
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jul;26(3):423-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.70780.
8
Adjuncts to improve outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy.
Curr Urol Rep. 2010 Mar;11(2):93-7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-010-0094-8.
9
Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.
Nat Rev Urol. 2009 Dec;6(12):660-70. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2009.216.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping.
BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(1):104-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07922.x. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
2
Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery.
BJU Int. 2007 Sep;100(3):624-7; discussion 627-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07007.x. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
3
Dual-head lithotripsy in synchronous mode: acute effect on renal function and morphology in the pig.
BJU Int. 2007 May;99(5):1134-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06736.x. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
6
Prevention of lithotripsy-induced renal injury by pretreating kidneys with low-energy shock waves.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Mar;17(3):663-73. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005060634. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
9
Shockwave lithotripsy: dose-related effects on renal structure, hemodynamics, and tubular function.
J Endourol. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):90-101. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.90.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验