Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Urol. 2014 Jan;191(1):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.087. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
Focused ultrasonic propulsion is a new noninvasive technique designed to move kidney stones and stone fragments out of the urinary collecting system. However, to our knowledge the extent of tissue injury associated with this technique is not known. We quantitated the amount of tissue injury produced by focused ultrasonic propulsion under simulated clinical treatment conditions and under conditions of higher power or continuous duty cycles. We compared those results to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy injury.
A human calcium oxalate monohydrate stone and/or nickel beads were implanted by ureteroscopy in 3 kidneys of live pigs weighing 45 to 55 kg and repositioned using focused ultrasonic propulsion. Additional pig kidneys were exposed to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy level pulse intensity or continuous ultrasound exposure 10 minutes in duration using an ultrasound probe transcutaneously or on the kidney. These kidneys were compared to 6 treated with an unmodified Dornier HM3 lithotripter (Dornier Medical Systems, Kennesaw, Georgia) using 2,400 shocks at 120 shock waves per minute and 24 kV. Histological analysis was performed to assess the volume of hemorrhagic tissue injury created by each technique according to the percent of functional renal volume.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy produced a mean ± SEM lesion of 1.56% ± 0.45% of functional renal volume. Ultrasonic propulsion produced no detectable lesion with simulated clinical treatment. A lesion of 0.46% ± 0.37% or 1.15% ± 0.49% of functional renal volume was produced when excessive treatment parameters were used with the ultrasound probe placed on the kidney.
Focused ultrasonic propulsion produced no detectable morphological injury to the renal parenchyma when using clinical treatment parameters but produced injury comparable in size to that of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy when using excessive treatment parameters.
聚焦超声推进是一种新的非侵入性技术,旨在将肾结石和结石碎片从尿路收集系统中移出。然而,据我们所知,这种技术相关的组织损伤程度尚不清楚。我们定量评估了在模拟临床治疗条件下和高功率或连续工作周期条件下聚焦超声推进引起的组织损伤程度,并将这些结果与体外冲击波碎石术损伤进行了比较。
通过输尿管镜将人草酸钙一水合物结石和/或镍珠植入 3 只体重为 45 至 55 千克的活猪的肾脏中,并使用聚焦超声推进重新定位。另外,通过经皮或肾脏上的超声探头将额外的猪肾暴露于体外冲击波碎石术的脉冲强度或连续超声暴露 10 分钟,持续时间为 10 分钟。将这些肾脏与 6 只未经过修改的多尼尔 HM3 碎石机(多尼尔医疗系统,佐治亚州肯尼索)进行比较,该碎石机以 120 次/分钟的速度产生 2400 次冲击,24 千伏。根据每种技术创建的功能性肾体积的百分比,进行组织学分析以评估出血性组织损伤的体积。
体外冲击波碎石术产生的平均 ± SEM 病变为功能性肾体积的 1.56% ± 0.45%。模拟临床治疗时,超声推进未检测到病变。当在肾脏上放置超声探头并使用过高的治疗参数时,病变为功能性肾体积的 0.46% ± 0.37%或 1.15% ± 0.49%。
当使用临床治疗参数时,聚焦超声推进对肾实质没有检测到形态损伤,但当使用过高的治疗参数时,其损伤大小与体外冲击波碎石术相当。