Förster Johannes G, Niemi Tomi T, Salmenperä Markku T, Ikonen Saana, Rosenberg Per H
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):351-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818d0392.
The epidural stimulation test to confirm epidural catheter position has been described as being simple, fast, and reliable. We evaluated the feasibility of the epidural stimulation test and its potential in contributing to effective postoperative continuous epidural analgesia.
Thirty adult patients (ASA I-III) undergoing major abdominal surgery or thoracotomy were to receive continuous epidural analgesia at a thoracic level postoperatively. The epidural stimulation test was performed after catheter placement, after local anesthetic boluses, and during epidural analgesia, up to six times in each patient. Catheter positions were verified by epidurography (before start of epidural analgesia and again on the second postoperative day).
Several technical issues (e.g., need to flush catheter with saline in order to maintain adequate stimulation during >25% of all measurements) and interpretation problems (e.g., interference of respiratory activity [n = 6]) made the implementation of the epidural stimulation test rather time consuming, both at the time of catheter placement and during epidural analgesia. Immediately after catheter placement (before test dose) the epidural stimulation test did not identify four of four catheters positioned outside the spinal canal. In addition, the initial epidural stimulation test indicated a possible intrathecal or paravertebral placement in 3 of 25 catheters correctly positioned in the epidural space. During 107 of 122 (88%) measurements with the catheter tip situated epidurally and with preceding or simultaneous administration of epidural local anesthetic, the epidural stimulation test elicited a motor response. Continuous epidural analgesia provided adequate pain relief in all 25 patients having positive epidurography.
The epidural stimulation test was often associated with technical difficulties and interpretation problems. The role of the repeated use of the epidural stimulation test for quality assurance in patients undergoing postoperative continuous epidural analgesia remains undetermined.
硬膜外刺激试验用于确认硬膜外导管位置,已被描述为简单、快速且可靠。我们评估了硬膜外刺激试验的可行性及其对有效术后持续硬膜外镇痛的潜在作用。
30例接受腹部大手术或开胸手术的成年患者(ASA I - III级)术后将接受胸段持续硬膜外镇痛。在置管后、注射局部麻醉药推注后以及硬膜外镇痛期间进行硬膜外刺激试验,每位患者最多进行6次。通过硬膜外造影(在硬膜外镇痛开始前以及术后第二天再次进行)来验证导管位置。
几个技术问题(例如,在所有测量的>25%期间需要用盐水冲洗导管以维持足够的刺激)和解释问题(例如,呼吸活动的干扰[n = 6])使得在置管时和硬膜外镇痛期间实施硬膜外刺激试验相当耗时。置管后立即(在试验剂量前),硬膜外刺激试验未能识别出4根位于椎管外的导管中的任何一根。此外,最初的硬膜外刺激试验表明,在25根正确置于硬膜外间隙的导管中有3根可能为鞘内或椎旁置管。在122次测量中的107次(88%)中,导管尖端位于硬膜外且在硬膜外局部麻醉药之前或同时给药时,硬膜外刺激试验引发了运动反应。在所有25例硬膜外造影阳性的患者中,持续硬膜外镇痛均提供了充分的疼痛缓解。
硬膜外刺激试验常伴有技术困难和解释问题。在接受术后持续硬膜外镇痛的患者中,重复使用硬膜外刺激试验进行质量保证的作用仍未确定。