Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Feb;26(1):83-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
To compare the results of continuous epidural bupivacaine analgesia with and without hydromorphone to continuous paravertebral analgesia with bupivcaine in patients with post-thoracotomy pain.
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial.
A teaching hospital.
Patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital undergoing throracotomy for lung cancer.
Subjects were assigned randomly to receive a continuous thoracic epidural or paravertebral infusion. Patients in the epidural group were randomized to receive either bupivacaine alone or in combination with hydromorphone. Visual analog scores as well as incentive spirometery results were obtained before and after thoracotomy.
Seventy-five consecutive patients presenting for thoracotomy were enrolled in this institutional review board-approved study. On the morning of surgery, subjects were randomized to either an epidural group receiving bupvicaine with and without hydromorphone or a paravertebral catheter-infused bupvicaine. Postoperative visual analog scores and incentive spirometry data were measured in the postanesthesia care unit, the evening of the first operative day, and daily thereafter until postoperative day 4. Analgesia on all postoperative days was superior in the thoracic epidural group receiving bupivacaine plus hydromorphone. Analgesia was similar in the epidural and continuous paravertebral groups receiving bupivacaine alone. No significant improvement was noted by combining the continuous infusion of bupivacaine via the paravertebral and epidural routes. Incentive spirometry goals were best achieved in the epidural bupivacaine and hydromorphone group and equal in the group receiving bupivacaine alone either via epidural or continuous paravertebral infusion.
The current study provided data that fill gaps in the current literature in 3 important areas. First, this study found that thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) with bupivacaine and a hydrophilic opioid, hydromorphone, may provide enhanced analgesia over TEA or continuous paravertebral infusion (CPI) with bupivacaine alone. Second, in the bupivacaine-alone group, the increased basal rates required to achieve analgesia resulted in hypotension more frequently than in the bupivacaine/hydromorphone combination group, underscoring the benefit of the synergistic activity. Finally, in agreement with previous retrospective studies, the current data suggest that CPI of local anesthetic appears to provide acceptable analgesia for post-thoracotomy pain.
比较布比卡因连续硬膜外镇痛与布比卡因联合氢吗啡酮连续椎旁镇痛在开胸术后疼痛患者中的效果。
前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
教学医院。
在一家三级教学医院行肺癌开胸术的患者。
受试者随机接受连续胸椎硬膜外或椎旁输注。硬膜外组患者随机接受布比卡因单独或联合氢吗啡酮。术前和术后均进行视觉模拟评分和激励肺活量测定。
本机构审查委员会批准的这项研究共纳入 75 例连续开胸术患者。手术当天早晨,患者被随机分为硬膜外组(接受布比卡因联合或不联合氢吗啡酮)或椎旁导管输注布比卡因组。术后在麻醉后护理单元、术后第一天晚上以及此后每天测量术后视觉模拟评分和激励肺活量数据。接受布比卡因联合氢吗啡酮的胸段硬膜外组在所有术后天的镇痛效果均优于其他组。接受布比卡因单独硬膜外或连续椎旁输注的两组镇痛效果相似。通过联合使用经硬膜外和椎旁途径连续输注布比卡因,并未显著改善镇痛效果。激励肺活量目标在接受布比卡因联合氢吗啡酮的硬膜外组中实现最佳,在接受布比卡因单独硬膜外或连续椎旁输注的两组中实现相等。
本研究提供的数据填补了当前文献中 3 个重要领域的空白。首先,本研究发现与单独使用布比卡因的胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)或连续椎旁输注(CPI)相比,布比卡因联合亲脂性阿片类药物氢吗啡酮的 TEA 可能提供更强的镇痛效果。其次,在布比卡因单独组中,为达到镇痛效果而增加的基础输注率比布比卡因/氢吗啡酮联合组更频繁地导致低血压,这突出了协同作用的益处。最后,与之前的回顾性研究一致,本研究数据表明局部麻醉药的 CPI 似乎可为开胸术后疼痛提供可接受的镇痛效果。