Park Je-On, Park Dong-Hyuk, Kim Sang-Dae, Lim Dong-Jun, Park Jung-Yul
Department of Neurosurgery , Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2007 Oct;42(4):326-30. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2007.42.4.326. Epub 2007 Oct 20.
Stroke is the most prevalent disease involving the central nervous system. Since medical modalities are sometimes ineffective for the acute edema following massive infarction, surgical decompression may be an effective option when medical treatments fail. The present study was undertaken to assess the outcome and prognostic factors of decompressive surgery in life threatening acute, severe, brain infarction.
We retrospectively analyzed twenty-six patients (17 males and 9 females; average age, 49.7yrs) who underwent decompressive surgery for severe cerebral or cerebellar infarction from January 2003 to December 2006. Surgical indication was based on the clinical signs such as neurological deterioration, pupillary reflex, and radiological findings. Clinical outcome was assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).
Of the 26 patients, 5 (19.2%) showed good recovery, 5 (19.2%) showed moderate disability, 2 (7.7%) severe disability, 6 (23.1%) persistent experienced vegetative state, and 8 (30.8%) death. In this study, the surgical decompression improved outcome for cerebellar infarction, but decompressive surgery did not show a good result for MCA infarction (30.8% overall mortality vs 100% mortality). The dominant-hemisphere infarcts showed worse prognosis, compared with nondominant-hemisphere infarcts (54.5% vs 70%). Poor prognostic factors were diabetes mellitus, dominant-hemisphere infarcts and low preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score.
The patients who exhibit clinical deterioration despite aggressive medical management following severe cerebral infarction should be considered for decompressive surgery. For better outcome, prompt surgical treatment is mandatory. We recommend that patients with severe cerebral infarction should be referred to neurosurgical department primarily in emergency setting or as early as possible for such prompt surgical treatment.
中风是中枢神经系统最常见的疾病。由于对于大面积梗死之后的急性水肿,有时药物治疗无效,因此当药物治疗失败时,手术减压可能是一种有效的选择。本研究旨在评估危及生命的急性、严重脑梗死减压手术的疗效及预后因素。
我们回顾性分析了2003年1月至2006年12月期间因严重脑梗死或小脑梗死接受减压手术的26例患者(17例男性,9例女性;平均年龄49.7岁)。手术指征基于神经功能恶化、瞳孔反射等临床体征以及影像学检查结果。临床疗效采用格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)进行评估。
26例患者中,5例(19.2%)恢复良好,5例(19.2%)中度残疾,2例(7.7%)重度残疾,6例(23.1%)持续处于植物人状态,8例(30.8%)死亡。在本研究中,手术减压改善了小脑梗死的预后,但对大脑中动脉梗死的效果不佳(总体死亡率30.8% vs 100%)。与非优势半球梗死相比,优势半球梗死的预后更差(54.5% vs 70%)。预后不良因素包括糖尿病、优势半球梗死以及术前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分低。
对于严重脑梗死患者,尽管积极进行药物治疗仍出现临床恶化时,应考虑进行减压手术。为获得更好的疗效,必须及时进行手术治疗。我们建议,严重脑梗死患者应在紧急情况下或尽早转诊至神经外科进行此类及时的手术治疗。