Huh Jun Suk, Shin Hyung Shik, Shin Jun Jae, Kim Tae Hong, Hwang Yong Soon, Park Sang Keun
Department of Neurosurgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2007 Oct;42(4):331-6. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2007.42.4.331. Epub 2007 Oct 20.
The aim of this study was to analyze the treatment results and prognostic factors in patients with massive cerebral infarction who underwent decompressive craniectomy.
From January 2000 to December 2005, we performed decompressive craniectomy in 24 patients with massive cerebral infarction. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records, radiological findings, initial clinical assessment using the Glasgow Coma Scale, serial computerized tomography (CT) with measurement of midline and septum pellucidum shift, and cerebral infarction territories. Patients were evaluated based on the following factors : the pre- and post-operative midline shifting on CT scan, infarction area or its dominancy, consciousness level, pupillary light reflex and Glasgow Outcome Scale.
All 24 patients (11 men, 13 women; mean age, 63 years; right middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory, 17 patients; left MCA territory, 7 patients) were treated with large decompressive craniectomy and duroplasty. The average time interval between the onset of symptoms and surgical decompression was 2.5 days. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale was 12.4 on admission and 8.3 preoperatively. Of the 24 surgically treated patients, the good outcome group (Group 2 : GOS 4-5) comprised 9 cases and the poor outcome group (Group1 : GOS 1-3) comprised 15 cases.
We consider decompressive craniectomy for large hemispheric infarction as a life-saving procedure. Good preoperative GCS, late clinical deterioration, small size of the infarction area, absence of anisocoria, and preoperative midline shift less than 11mm were considered to be positive predictors of good outcome. Careful patient selection based on the above-mentioned factors and early operation may improve the functional outcome of surgical management for large hemispheric infarction.
本研究旨在分析接受减压颅骨切除术的大面积脑梗死患者的治疗结果及预后因素。
2000年1月至2005年12月,我们对24例大面积脑梗死患者实施了减压颅骨切除术。我们回顾性分析了病历、影像学检查结果、使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表进行的初始临床评估、测量中线和透明隔移位的系列计算机断层扫描(CT)以及脑梗死区域。根据以下因素对患者进行评估:CT扫描术前和术后的中线移位、梗死面积或其优势、意识水平、瞳孔光反射和格拉斯哥预后量表。
所有24例患者(11例男性,13例女性;平均年龄63岁;右侧大脑中动脉(MCA)区域17例;左侧MCA区域7例)均接受了大骨瓣减压术和硬脑膜成形术。症状出现至手术减压的平均时间间隔为2.5天。入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表平均评分为12.4,术前为8.3。在24例接受手术治疗的患者中,良好预后组(第2组:格拉斯哥预后量表4 - 5分)9例,不良预后组(第1组:格拉斯哥预后量表1 - 3分)15例。
我们认为对大面积半球梗死行减压颅骨切除术是一种挽救生命的手术。术前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分良好、临床晚期恶化、梗死面积小且无瞳孔不等大、术前中线移位小于11mm被认为是良好预后的积极预测因素。基于上述因素仔细选择患者并早期手术可能会改善大面积半球梗死手术治疗的功能结局。