Yun Ji Kwang, Kang Sung Don, Kim Jong Moon
Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2007 Nov;42(5):388-91. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2007.42.5.388. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
The focus of aneurysm surgery is eliminating unnecessary operative manipulations and preparing the surgeon for any crises that might arise. With this concept in mind, we have tried resection of the gyrus rectus without routine sylvian fissure dissection in selected patients with anterior communicating artery (ACom) aneurysms, and compared these results with those from the conventional transsylvian approach.
This retrospective study included 231 surgically treated patients with ACom aneurysms from March, 1997 to May, 2005. The patients were divided into two groups : Group A (96 with sylvian fissure dissection, March, 1997-December, 2000) and Group B (135 without sylvian fissure dissection, January, 2001-May, 2005). Overall surgical outcomes were compared, and operative times have been prospectively recorded since January, 04 to evaluate how this maneuver affected the length of surgical procedures.
All aneurysms were satisfactorily clipped, and there was no evidence of increased number of procedure-related retraction injuries in group B. Overall outcome was good in 186 (80.5%); 76 (79.2%) in group A, and 110 (81.5%) in group B (x(2) test, p=0.79). In good clinical grade of group A, good outcome was observed in 60 patients (89.6%) and in group B, 97 patients (94.2%) (Fisher's exact test, p=0.38) (Fig. 2).
In this study, eliminating the step of sylvian fissure dissection by gentle lateral basal-frontal retraction to the side of the sylvian fissure did not increase morbidity and mortality. However, we do not intend to modify the standard approach to the ACom aneurysm that is familiar to and has been mastered by many others. Rather, we report our experience on the basis of our anatomic understanding of the technique and its results.
动脉瘤手术的重点是消除不必要的手术操作,并让外科医生为可能出现的任何危机做好准备。基于这一理念,我们尝试在部分前交通动脉(ACom)动脉瘤患者中不进行常规的外侧裂分离而切除直回,并将这些结果与传统经外侧裂入路的结果进行比较。
这项回顾性研究纳入了1997年3月至2005年5月期间231例接受手术治疗的ACom动脉瘤患者。患者被分为两组:A组(96例,进行外侧裂分离,1997年3月至2000年12月)和B组(135例,不进行外侧裂分离,2001年1月至2005年5月)。比较总体手术结果,并自2004年1月起前瞻性记录手术时间,以评估该操作对手术过程长度的影响。
所有动脉瘤均成功夹闭,且没有证据表明B组与手术相关的牵拉损伤数量增加。总体结果良好的有186例(80.5%);A组76例(79.2%),B组110例(81.5%)(χ²检验,p = 0.79)。在临床分级良好的患者中,A组60例(89.6%)结果良好,B组97例(94.2%)结果良好(Fisher精确检验,p = 0.38)(图2)。
在本研究中,通过向外侧裂一侧轻柔地进行基底额叶外侧牵拉来消除外侧裂分离步骤,并未增加发病率和死亡率。然而,我们并不打算改变许多其他人熟悉并已掌握的ACom动脉瘤标准入路。相反,我们是基于对该技术的解剖学理解及其结果来报告我们的经验。