Suppr超能文献

反应代码从选择反应任务到是/否反应任务的转换。

Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.

作者信息

Ansorge Ulrich, Wühr Peter

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Universität Wien, Wien, Austria.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jun;62(6):1216-35. doi: 10.1080/17470210802426866. Epub 2008 Dec 16.

Abstract

The present study investigated the conditions for observing the Simon effect in go/no-go tasks. The Simon effect denotes faster and more accurate responses when irrelevant stimulus location and response location correspond than when they do not correspond. In four experiments, participants performed both in a choice-response task (CRT) and in a go/no-go task, and we varied the order and the similarity of the tasks. In the CRT, participants pressed a left key to one stimulus colour and a right key to another stimulus colour; in the go/no-go task, participants pressed one (e.g., left) key to one stimulus colour and refrained from responding to the other stimulus colour. As expected, Simon effects were consistently observed in the CRT. In contrast, Simon effects in the go/no-go task were only observed when it followed the CRT and when the mapping of stimulus colours to response locations was preserved between tasks (i.e., in Experiment 4). Results suggest that transfer of a particular S-R rule including response location from the CRT to the go/no-go task was responsible for the Simon effect in the latter task. In general, results are consistent with a response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.

摘要

本研究调查了在执行/不执行任务中观察西蒙效应的条件。西蒙效应是指当无关刺激位置与反应位置相对应时,反应速度更快且更准确,反之则不然。在四项实验中,参与者既要完成选择反应任务(CRT),也要完成执行/不执行任务,我们改变了任务的顺序和相似性。在CRT中,参与者对一种刺激颜色按左键,对另一种刺激颜色按右键;在执行/不执行任务中,参与者对一种刺激颜色按一个键(如左键),而对另一种刺激颜色不做反应。正如预期的那样,在CRT中始终观察到西蒙效应。相比之下,只有当执行/不执行任务在CRT之后进行,且任务之间刺激颜色与反应位置的映射保持一致时(即实验4),才会在执行/不执行任务中观察到西蒙效应。结果表明,从CRT到执行/不执行任务的特定刺激-反应规则(包括反应位置)的迁移是后者任务中西蒙效应的原因。总体而言,结果与西蒙效应的反应辨别解释一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验