Ramesh Banadakoppa M, Moses Stephen, Washington Reynold, Isac Shajy, Mohapatra Bidhubhushan, Mahagaonkar Sangameshwar B, Adhikary Rajatashuvra, Brahmam Ginnela N V, Paranjape Ramesh S, Subramanian Thilakavathi, Blanchard James F
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
AIDS. 2008 Dec;22 Suppl 5:S35-44. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000343762.54831.5c.
OBJECTIVE: In four states in southern India we explored the determinants of HIV prevalence among female sex workers (FSW), as well as factors associated with district-level variations in HIV prevalence among FSW. METHODS: Data from cross-sectional surveys in 23 districts were analysed, with HIV prevalence as the outcome variable, and sociodemographic and sex work characteristics as predictor variables. Multilevel logistic regression was applied to identify factors that could explain variations in HIV prevalence among districts. RESULTS: HIV prevalence among the 10 096 FSW surveyed was 14.5% (95% confidence interval 14.0-15.4), with a large interdistrict variation, ranging from 2% to 38%. Current marital status and the usual place of solicitation emerged as important factors that determine individual probability of being HIV positive, as well as the HIV prevalence within districts. In multivariate analysis, compared with home-based FSW, the odds of being HIV positive was greater for brothel-based FSW [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.17, P <or= 0.001] and for public place-based FSW (AOR 1.32, P = 0.005). Unmarried FSW and those who were widowed/divorced/separated, or from the devadasi tradition, had higher odds of being HIV positive (AOR 1.79, P <or= 0.001 and 1.98, P < 0.001, respectively), than those currently married. The estimated district level variance in HIV prevalence was lowest (0.152) for brothel-based unmarried FSW, followed by brothel-based widowed/divorced/separated or devadasi FSW (0.192). CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity in the organization and structure of sex work is an important determinant of variations in HIV prevalence among FSW across districts in India, much more so than the districts themselves. This understanding should help to improve the design of HIV preventive interventions.
目的:在印度南部的四个邦,我们探究了女性性工作者(FSW)中艾滋病毒流行率的决定因素,以及与各地区FSW艾滋病毒流行率差异相关的因素。 方法:对23个地区的横断面调查数据进行分析,将艾滋病毒流行率作为结果变量,社会人口统计学和性工作特征作为预测变量。应用多水平逻辑回归来确定能够解释各地区艾滋病毒流行率差异的因素。 结果:在接受调查的10096名FSW中,艾滋病毒流行率为14.5%(95%置信区间14.0 - 15.4),地区间差异很大,范围从2%到38%。当前婚姻状况和通常拉客地点成为决定个体艾滋病毒阳性概率以及各地区艾滋病毒流行率的重要因素。在多变量分析中,与在家工作的FSW相比,在妓院工作的FSW艾滋病毒阳性几率更高[调整后的优势比(AOR)2.17,P≤0.001],在公共场所工作的FSW也是如此(AOR 1.32,P = 0.005)。未婚FSW以及丧偶/离婚/分居或来自神庙舞女传统的FSW,艾滋病毒阳性几率高于目前已婚者(分别为AOR 1.79, P≤0.001和AOR 1.98, P < 0.001)。基于妓院的未婚FSW艾滋病毒流行率的估计地区水平方差最低(0.152),其次是基于妓院的丧偶/离婚/分居或神庙舞女FSW(0.192)。 结论:性工作组织和结构的异质性是印度各地区FSW艾滋病毒流行率差异的重要决定因素,比各地区本身的影响更大。这种认识应有助于改进艾滋病毒预防干预措施的设计。
BMC Public Health. 2005-8-20
Sex Transm Dis. 2012-10