Nierenberg A A
Treatment Resistant Depression Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02178.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1991 Sep;52(9):383-5.
Because limited evidence exists to help clinicians choose the next step after a depressed patient fails to respond to an adequate trial of an antidepressant, I conducted a survey to explore psychiatrists' treatment choices.
I asked 118 northeastern psychiatrists what they would do next in response to a clinical vignette of an inpatient with DMS-III-R major depression who failed to respond to 4 weeks of nortriptyline at adequate blood levels.
Lithium augmentation was chosen by more than a third (33.9%) of psychiatrists. Other choices, in order of decreasing frequency, were continuing nortriptyline for another 2 weeks (17.8%) and switching to either fluoxetine (16.1%), electroconvulsive therapy (11.0%), or a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (6.8%). Only one psychiatrist each chose thyroid augmentation or bupropion.
The surveyed psychiatrists overwhelmingly preferred lithium augmentation over other strategies to manage treatment-resistant depression. Research on comparative strategies is lacking and urgently needed.
由于帮助临床医生在抑郁症患者对抗抑郁药进行充分试验后未产生反应时选择下一步治疗措施的证据有限,我进行了一项调查以探究精神科医生的治疗选择。
我询问了118名东北部的精神科医生,对于一名患有DMS - III - R重度抑郁症的住院患者,在其血药浓度达到适当水平的情况下服用去甲替林4周后仍无反应的临床案例,他们接下来会采取什么措施。
超过三分之一(33.9%)的精神科医生选择加用锂盐。其他选择按频率递减依次为继续服用去甲替林2周(17.8%)、换用氟西汀(16.1%)、采用电休克治疗(11.0%)或单胺氧化酶抑制剂(6.8%)。只有一名精神科医生分别选择加用甲状腺素或安非他酮。
接受调查的精神科医生在处理难治性抑郁症时,绝大多数更倾向于加用锂盐而非其他策略。目前缺乏且迫切需要关于比较性策略的研究。