• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项旨在改善癌症患者连续性医疗体验的复杂干预措施的开发与初步评估

Development and pilot evaluation of a complex intervention to improve experienced continuity of care in patients with cancer.

作者信息

King M, Jones L, McCarthy O, Rogers M, Richardson A, Williams R, Tookman A, Nazareth I

机构信息

Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2009 Jan 27;100(2):274-80. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604836. Epub 2008 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604836
PMID:19107130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2634705/
Abstract

High experienced continuity of care in patients with cancer is associated with lower needs for care, better quality of life and better psychological outcomes. We developed and evaluated an intervention to improve experienced continuity. The intervention, consisted of (1) a 17-item patient-completed continuity assessment; (2) feedback to clinical nurse specialists and action to address the needs identified. Multidisciplinary team meetings and oncology outpatient clinics were observed, and patients and staff were interviewed. After qualitative work and reliability testing, the intervention was evaluated in a feasibility trial. Sixty-one patients provided data for analysis. No statistically significant differences were found in patients' experienced continuity between the trial arms, but important trends were seen in measures of needs for care in favour of those receiving the intervention. Feeding back findings from the continuity assessment to clinicians reduced patients' needs for care. Our results indicate that an intervention to target patients' experiences of continuity can reduce their subsequent needs for care. However, overcoming barriers to organisational change and addressing some patients' hesitation to report their continuity difficulties must be considered when implementing such an intervention. A phase III trial targeting patients with inadequate experienced continuity of care is recommended.

摘要

癌症患者获得高度持续的专业照护与较低的照护需求、更好的生活质量以及更佳的心理状况相关。我们研发并评估了一项旨在改善实际照护持续性的干预措施。该干预措施包括:(1)一份由患者填写的包含17项内容的持续性评估表;(2)向临床护理专家反馈评估结果,并针对所发现的需求采取行动。我们观察了多学科团队会议和肿瘤门诊,并对患者及工作人员进行了访谈。经过定性研究和信度测试后,我们在一项可行性试验中对该干预措施进行了评估。61名患者提供了分析数据。试验组之间患者实际感受到的照护持续性并无统计学上的显著差异,但在照护需求指标方面出现了有利于接受干预措施患者的重要趋势。将持续性评估结果反馈给临床医生可降低患者的照护需求。我们的结果表明,针对患者照护持续性体验的干预措施可降低其后续的照护需求。然而,在实施此类干预措施时,必须考虑克服组织变革的障碍以及应对一些患者不愿报告其照护持续性困难的问题。建议针对照护持续性体验不足的患者开展III期试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c414/2634705/cc6717e9ead6/6604836f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c414/2634705/8eb1d4a10368/6604836f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c414/2634705/cc6717e9ead6/6604836f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c414/2634705/8eb1d4a10368/6604836f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c414/2634705/cc6717e9ead6/6604836f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and pilot evaluation of a complex intervention to improve experienced continuity of care in patients with cancer.一项旨在改善癌症患者连续性医疗体验的复杂干预措施的开发与初步评估
Br J Cancer. 2009 Jan 27;100(2):274-80. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604836. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
2
Perceived concepts of continuity of care in people with colorectal and breast cancer--a qualitative case study analysis.结直肠癌和乳腺癌患者对连续性护理的认知概念——一项定性案例研究分析
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Nov;17(6):569-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00891.x. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
3
[Continuity of care in oncology. Quantitative analysis of data from patients treated in two different settings in Emilia--Romagna.].[肿瘤学中的连续性护理。对艾米利亚-罗马涅地区两种不同治疗环境下患者数据的定量分析。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Jun;108(6):288-293. doi: 10.1701/2715.27716.
4
Impact of a pivot nurse in oncology on patients with lung or breast cancer: symptom distress, fatigue, quality of life, and use of healthcare resources.肿瘤科室的枢纽护士对肺癌或乳腺癌患者的影响:症状困扰、疲劳、生活质量及医疗资源利用情况
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008 Nov;35(6):948-54. doi: 10.1188/08.ONF.948-954.
5
Barriers and facilitators to implementing cancer survivorship care plans.实施癌症幸存者护理计划的障碍与促进因素。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Nov;40(6):575-80. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.575-580.
6
7
An exploratory study of the follow-up care needs of patients treated for colorectal cancer.治疗结直肠癌患者的随访护理需求探索性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Dec;19(23-24):3291-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03407.x. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
8
Understanding cancer patients' experience and outcomes: development and pilot study of the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance patient survey.了解癌症患者的经历与治疗结果:癌症护理结果研究与监测患者调查的开发与初步研究
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Aug;14(8):837-48. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0902-8. Epub 2006 Feb 16.
9
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
10
The relationship between patients' experiences of continuity of cancer care and health outcomes: a mixed methods study.癌症护理连续性患者体验与健康结果之间的关系:一项混合方法研究。
Br J Cancer. 2008 Feb 12;98(3):529-36. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604164. Epub 2008 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A concept analysis of transitional care for people with cancer.癌症患者过渡期护理的概念分析。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jan;11(1):e2083. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2083.
2
A mHealth-based nursing model for assessing the health outcomes of the discharged patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a pilot RCT.一种基于移动健康的鼻咽癌出院患者健康结局评估护理模式:一项随机对照试验的初步研究
BMC Nurs. 2022 Aug 1;21(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00993-0.
3
Continuity and coordination of care in highly selected chronic cancer patients treated with multiple repeat radiation therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuity of care matters.连续性护理很重要。
BMJ. 2008 Aug 7;337:a867. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a867.
2
The relationship between patients' experiences of continuity of cancer care and health outcomes: a mixed methods study.癌症护理连续性患者体验与健康结果之间的关系:一项混合方法研究。
Br J Cancer. 2008 Feb 12;98(3):529-36. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604164. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
3
Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.当地意见领袖:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
对多次重复放疗的高度选择的慢性癌症患者进行连续性和协调性的治疗。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Nov 24;16(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01949-5.
4
Assessing the impact of clinical coordination interventions on the continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions: participatory action research in five Latin American countries.评估临床协调干预对慢性病患者护理连续性的影响:五个拉丁美洲国家的参与式行动研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Jan 13;37(1):1-11. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab130.
5
Continuity of Care, Follow-Up Care, and Outcomes among Breast Cancer Survivors.乳腺癌幸存者的连续护理、随访护理和结局。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 22;16(17):3050. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173050.
6
Multidisciplinary care of breast cancer patients: a scoping review of multidisciplinary styles, processes, and outcomes.乳腺癌患者的多学科护理:多学科模式、流程和结果的范围综述。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(3):e385-e397. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4713. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
7
A qualitative study on the attitudes of patients with gastrointestinal cancer toward being informed of the truth.一项关于胃肠癌患者对被告知病情真相的态度的定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Oct 31;12:2283-2290. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S179465. eCollection 2018.
8
High experienced continuity in breast cancer care is associated with high health related quality of life.乳腺癌护理中高度的经验连续性与较高的健康相关生活质量相关。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2925-0.
9
Interventions to improve care coordination between primary healthcare and oncology care providers: a systematic review.改善初级医疗保健与肿瘤护理提供者之间护理协调的干预措施:一项系统综述。
ESMO Open. 2016 Sep 6;1(5):e000077. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000077. eCollection 2016.
10
Patients' experiences with continuity of cancer care in Canada: Results from the CanIMPACT study.加拿大癌症护理连续性患者体验:CanIMPACT研究结果
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):821-827.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD000125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub3.
4
Acceptability of an advance care planning interview schedule: a focus group study.预先护理计划访谈时间表的可接受性:一项焦点小组研究。
Palliat Med. 2007 Jan;21(1):23-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216306073638.
5
Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review.连续性护理:多学科综述。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219.
6
Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.一种评估癌症患者需求的工具的评估。支持性护理审查小组。
Cancer. 2000 Jan 1;88(1):217-25. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000101)88:1<217::aid-cncr29>3.0.co;2-y.
7
Intensified primary cancer care: a randomized study of home care nurse contacts.强化原发性癌症护理:家庭护理护士联系的随机研究
J Adv Nurs. 1999 Nov;30(5):1137-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01193.x.
8
Care process and satisfaction analysis of a transmural home care program.经壁家庭护理项目的护理过程与满意度分析
Int J Nurs Stud. 1998 Jun;35(3):146-54. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(98)00022-4.
9
Randomised controlled trial of effects of coordinating care for terminally ill cancer patients.晚期癌症患者协调护理效果的随机对照试验
BMJ. 1992 Nov 28;305(6865):1317-22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6865.1317.