Pemberton L S, Din O S, Fisher P M, Hatton M Q
Department of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009 Apr;21(3):161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.11.016. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
A variety of radical radiotherapy regimens are in use for non-small cell lung cancer. Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART: 54 Gy in 36 fractions over 12 days) and accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy using 55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks are standard fractionations in our centre. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate survival outcome seen in routine clinical practice.
All case notes and radiotherapy records of radically treated patients between 1999 and 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. Basic patient demographics, tumours, characteristics, radiotherapy and survival data were collected.
In total, 277 patients received radical radiotherapy: 137 and 140 patients received CHART and hypofractionated radiotherapy, respectively. There were differences noted in the demographics between the two treatment schedules: median age 65 years (range 41-83) vs 73 years (range 33-87); histological confirmation rates 90% vs 76%; prior chemotherapy 34% vs 19% for CHART and hypofractionated treatment, respectively. For CHART patients, stages I, II, III and unclassified were 12, 8, 68 and 12% and the staging for the hypofractionated regimen was 54, 11, 34 and 2%, respectively. The median overall survival from the time of diagnosis was 20.4 months with a 40% 2-year survival rate. For the two fractionations the median survival was 16.6 months vs 21.4 months and 34% vs 45% of patients were alive at 2 years in the CHART and hypofractionated groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, stage was the only factor affecting overall survival - no difference was seen according to radiotherapy regimen.
This single-centre study reflects the outcome of unselected consecutively treated non-small cell lung cancer patients. Adjusting for stage, there was no significant difference in survival seen according to regimen. Encouragingly, CHART outcome shows reproducibility with the original CHART paper. Our hypofractionated outcome is similar to that previously reported, but despite this being the UK's most common regimen, 55 Gy in 20 daily fractions remains unvalidated by phase III trial data.
多种根治性放疗方案应用于非小细胞肺癌。持续超分割加速放疗(CHART:12天内36次分割给予54 Gy)和4周内20次分割给予55 Gy的加速低分割放疗是我们中心的标准分割方案。这项回顾性研究的主要目的是评估常规临床实践中的生存结果。
回顾性分析1999年至2004年间接受根治性治疗患者的所有病历和放疗记录。收集患者基本人口统计学资料、肿瘤情况、特征、放疗及生存数据。
共有277例患者接受了根治性放疗,其中137例和140例患者分别接受了CHART和低分割放疗。两种治疗方案的人口统计学存在差异:中位年龄分别为65岁(范围41 - 83岁)和73岁(范围33 - 87岁);组织学确诊率分别为90%和76%;CHART组和低分割治疗组的既往化疗率分别为34%和19%。CHART组患者中,Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期及未分类的分别占12%、8%、68%和12%,低分割方案的分期分别为54%、11%、34%和2%。从诊断时起的中位总生存期为20.4个月,2年生存率为40%。对于两种分割方案,CHART组和低分割组的中位生存期分别为16.6个月和21.4个月,2年时仍存活的患者分别占34%和45%。多因素分析显示,分期是影响总生存的唯一因素,放疗方案之间未见差异。
这项单中心研究反映了未经选择的连续治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的结果。校正分期后,不同方案的生存情况无显著差异。令人鼓舞的是,CHART的结果与原始CHART论文具有可重复性。我们的低分割结果与先前报道的相似,但尽管这是英国最常用的方案,20次每日分割给予55 Gy仍未得到Ⅲ期试验数据的验证。