Moini Majid, Rasouli Mohammad R, Kenari Mohammad Mahmoodzadeh, Mahmoodi Hamid Reza
Division of Vascular Surgery, Sina Hospital, Medical Sciences/Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2009 Jan;20(1):44-8.
To compare prospective between insertion of non-cuffed dual lumen catheter in the external jugular vein and other central veins for hemodialysis (HD), we studied 68 chronic dialysis patients randomly allocated into two groups: one with external jugular vein catheterization as access for HD and another with other central venous catheterization, internal jugular or subclavian vein. Our results showed there were no significant differences regarding successful cannulation, com-plications, total numbers of dialysis, development of pain and infection at the site of cannulation, patency rate of the catheters, and efficacy of hemodialysis between both groups. In addition, the patency of the catheter in the external jugular vein was not affected by previous cannulation of other central veins. In contrast, there was a significant correlation between numbers of attempts for cannulation in both groups and development of hematoma and infection, (p< 0.05). In conclusion, our results showed that the external jugular vein may be an alternative for other central veins for insertion of temporary non-cuffed hemodialysis catheter.
为比较在颈外静脉插入无套囊双腔导管与在其他中心静脉进行血液透析(HD)的前瞻性差异,我们研究了68例慢性透析患者,将其随机分为两组:一组采用颈外静脉置管作为HD通路,另一组采用其他中心静脉置管,即颈内静脉或锁骨下静脉置管。我们的结果显示,两组在成功插管、并发症、透析总次数、插管部位疼痛和感染的发生、导管通畅率以及血液透析疗效方面均无显著差异。此外,颈外静脉导管的通畅性不受先前其他中心静脉插管的影响。相比之下,两组的插管尝试次数与血肿和感染的发生之间存在显著相关性(p<0.05)。总之,我们的结果表明,颈外静脉可作为其他中心静脉插入临时无套囊血液透析导管的替代部位。