Yang Chih-Wei, Wang Hui-Chih, Chiang Wen-Chu, Hsu Che-Wei, Chang Wei-Tien, Yen Zui-Shen, Ko Patrick Chow-In, Ma Matthew Huei-Ming, Chen Shyr-Chyr, Chang Shan-Chwen
Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):490-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819573a5.
Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly improves survival of cardiac arrest victims. Dispatch assistance increases bystander CPR, but the quality of dispatcher-assisted CPR remains unsatisfactory. This study was conducted to assess the effect of adding interactive video communication to dispatch instruction on the quality of bystander chest compressions in simulated cardiac arrests.
A randomized controlled study with a scenario developed to simulate cardiac arrest in a public place.
The victim was simulated by a mannequin and the cell phone for dispatch assistance was a video cell phone with both voice and video modes. Chest compression-only CPR instruction was used in the dispatch protocol.
Ninety-six adults without CPR training within 5 years were recruited.
The subjects were randomized to receive dispatch assistance on chest compression with either voice instruction alone (voice group, n = 53) or interactive voice and video demonstration and feedback (video group, n = 43) via a video cell phone.
Performance of chest compression-only CPR throughout the scenario was videotaped. The quality of CPR was evaluated by reviewing the videos and mannequin reports. Chest compressions among the video group were faster (median rate 95.5 vs. 63.0 min-1, p < 0.01), deeper (median depth 36.0 vs. 25.0 mm, p < 0.01), and of more appropriate depth (20.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). The video group had more "hands-off" time (5.0 vs. 0 second, p < 0.01), longer time to first chest compression (145.0 vs. 116.0 seconds, p < 0.01) and total instruction time (150.0 vs. 121.0 seconds, p < 0.01).
The addition of interactive video communication to dispatcher-assisted chest compression-only CPR initially delayed the commencement of chest compressions, but subsequently improved the depth and rate of compressions. The benefit was achieved mainly through real-time feedback.
旁观者心肺复苏术(CPR)能显著提高心脏骤停患者的生存率。调度协助可增加旁观者实施心肺复苏术的比例,但调度员协助下的心肺复苏术质量仍不尽人意。本研究旨在评估在调度指令中增加交互式视频通信对模拟心脏骤停时旁观者胸外按压质量的影响。
一项随机对照研究,采用模拟公共场所心脏骤停的场景。
用人体模型模拟患者,用于调度协助的手机为具备语音和视频模式的可视手机。调度方案采用仅胸外按压的心肺复苏术指导。
招募96名在5年内未接受过心肺复苏术培训的成年人。
受试者被随机分为两组,一组通过可视手机仅接受语音指令的胸外按压调度协助(语音组,n = 53),另一组接受交互式语音和视频示范及反馈(视频组,n = 43)。
在整个场景中对仅胸外按压的心肺复苏术操作进行录像。通过查看录像和人体模型报告评估心肺复苏术质量。视频组的胸外按压速度更快(中位数频率95.5次/分钟对63.0次/分钟,p < 0.01)、按压深度更深(中位数深度36.0毫米对25.0毫米,p < 0.01)且深度更合适(20.0%对0%,p < 0.01)。视频组的“手离开”时间更长(5.0秒对0秒,p < 0.01)、首次胸外按压时间更长(145.0秒对116.0秒,p < 0.01)以及总指导时间更长(150.0秒对121.0秒,p < 0.01)。
在调度员协助的仅胸外按压心肺复苏术中增加交互式视频通信最初会延迟胸外按压开始时间,但随后可提高按压深度和频率。这一益处主要通过实时反馈实现。