Svirko Elena, Mellanby Jane
University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):e219-27. doi: 10.1080/01421590802334275.
Two main learning approaches adopted by students have been identified by research: deep (seeking for meaning motivated by interest in the subject matter) and surface (rote-learning motivated by fear of failure). There is evidence that learning approach is influenced by learning environment (e.g. Trigwell et al. 1999). Online courses pose the challenge of designing software that will encourage the more desirable approach to learning.
The aims were to evaluate how successful an online course is at encouraging deep approach to learning, which factors might influence the approach adopted towards it, and whether the approach adopted is related to academic performance.
Using 205 second-year pre-clinical medical students, we compared their approach to learning, as measured by Biggs et al. (2001) 2F-SPQ-R, for a computer-aided learning (CAL) course in Neuroanatomy with that for their studies in general. We then examined student attitudes towards the CAL course and the ratings of the course Web pages in terms of the learning approach they encourage (done by 18 independent raters).
The students reported using significantly less deep approach to learning for the CAL course. However, their approach for the course was not related to results on a neuroanatomy assessment based on it. Enjoyment of the course, assessment of the amount of information in it as appropriate, and ease of understanding the course were all associated with a deeper approach. The only agreement between the raters of the CAL course was for some pages that included patient case studies, which were unanimously given a very high deep rating. Assessment marks for questions referring to these pages were higher than for the rest of the assessment.
The study suggests that maximizing the use of clinical relevance should increase the interest and enjoyableness of the course and thereby aid deep learning and retention of information.
研究确定了学生采用的两种主要学习方法:深层学习(因对学科内容感兴趣而寻求意义)和表层学习(因害怕失败而死记硬背)。有证据表明学习方法受学习环境影响(如特里格韦尔等人,1999年)。在线课程带来了设计软件的挑战,这种软件应鼓励更理想的学习方法。
目的是评估在线课程在鼓励深层学习方法方面的成功程度,哪些因素可能影响对其采用的方法,以及所采用的方法是否与学业成绩相关。
我们使用205名临床前医学二年级学生,将他们在神经解剖学计算机辅助学习(CAL)课程中的学习方法(通过比格斯等人,2001年的2F-SPQ-R测量)与他们总体学习的方法进行比较。然后,我们根据学生对CAL课程的态度以及课程网页在鼓励学习方法方面的评分(由18名独立评分者完成)进行了研究。
学生报告在CAL课程中使用深层学习方法的比例显著较低。然而,他们在该课程上的学习方法与基于该课程的神经解剖学评估结果无关。对课程的喜爱程度、对其中信息量是否适当的评估以及对课程的理解难易程度都与更深入的学习方法相关。CAL课程评分者之间唯一达成一致的是一些包含患者案例研究的页面,这些页面被一致给予了非常高的深层评分。涉及这些页面的问题的评估分数高于其他评估问题。
该研究表明,最大限度地利用临床相关性应能增加课程的趣味性和吸引力,从而有助于深度学习和信息保留。