Hübsch P, Schneider B, Seidl G, Kalchhauser G, Klaushofer K, Popovic R
Abteilung für Diagnostische Radiologie, II. Medizinische Universitätsklinik Wien.
Aktuelle Radiol. 1991 Jul;1(4):169-73.
The bone mineral density measurements of three different instruments at the femoral head were compared using 12 cadaver specimens. Two of these instruments were operated by x-rays (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry = DEXA), whereas one system was based on a gadolinium source (dual photon absorptiometry = DPA). Although excellent correlation between the measurements was obtained (r greater than 0,9), the measurements of one of the DEXA-instruments were significantly higher than the measurements of the two other systems. We conclude that a comparison of bone mineral density measurements obtained on different densitometry instruments may pose problems. Follow-up examinations should be done on one single densitometry unit.
使用12具尸体标本比较了三种不同仪器在股骨头处的骨密度测量结果。其中两种仪器采用X射线操作(双能X线吸收法=DEXA),而另一种系统基于钆源(双光子吸收法=DPA)。尽管测量结果之间具有极好的相关性(r大于0.9),但其中一台DEXA仪器的测量值明显高于其他两个系统的测量值。我们得出结论,比较不同骨密度测量仪器获得的骨密度测量结果可能会出现问题。后续检查应在单一骨密度测量设备上进行。