Walters L
Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057.
Hum Gene Ther. 1991 Summer;2(2):115-22. doi: 10.1089/hum.1991.2.2-115.
The first three human gene transfer/therapy clinical protocols are now underway after having been subjected to an extensive review process by the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) and its Human Gene Therapy Subcommittee. The "Points to Consider" document developed by the RAC established the framework for evaluating genetic intervention protocols. This review process is taking place in a broader social context. Public attitude surveys in this country have indicated a general lack of knowledge in the area of genetic engineering but an acceptance of somatic-cell gene therapy as treatment for disease. Internationally, numerous policy statements on human genetic intervention have been published, all of which support the moral legitimacy of somatic-cell gene therapy for the cure of disease. The debate over the ethical issues related to somatic-cell gene therapy has evolved over a ten-year-period. The time has now come to begin a formal public process for the ethical assessment of germ-line genetic intervention.
在经过重组DNA咨询委员会(RAC)及其人类基因治疗小组委员会的广泛审查程序后,首批三项人类基因转移/治疗临床方案目前正在进行中。RAC制定的“要点考虑”文件确立了评估基因干预方案的框架。这一审查过程是在更广泛的社会背景下进行的。该国的公众态度调查表明,人们对基因工程领域普遍缺乏了解,但接受体细胞基因治疗作为疾病的治疗方法。在国际上,已经发表了许多关于人类基因干预的政策声明,所有这些声明都支持体细胞基因治疗用于治愈疾病的道德合法性。关于体细胞基因治疗相关伦理问题的辩论已经持续了十年。现在是时候开始一个正式的公众程序,对生殖系基因干预进行伦理评估了。