Onguru Pinar, Erbay Ayse, Bodur Hurrem, Baran Gulseren, Akinci Esragul, Balaban Neriman, Cevik Mustafa Aydin
Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
J Korean Med Sci. 2008 Dec;23(6):982-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.6.982. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for nosocomial infections of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IRPA). A prospective case-control study was performed at a tertiary care hospital in Ankara from January to December 2004. The patients with nosocomial P. aeruginosa infection were included in the study. The features of the patients with IRPA infections were compared to those with imipenem-sensitive P. aeruginosa (ISPA) infections. Only the first isolation of P. aeruginosa was considered. Nosocomial infections were defined according to Center for Disease Control (CDC) criteria. IRPA was isolated from 75 (44.1%) patients, and ISPA was isolated from 95 (55.9%) patients during the study period. IRPA were most frequently isolated from endotracheal aspirate (19%) cultures (p=0.048), whereas ISPA were most frequently isolated from urine (28%) cultures (p=0.023). In multivariate analysis, a longer duration of hospital stay until P. aeruginosa isolation (odds ratio [OR], 1.027; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002-1.054, p=0.034), arterial catheter administration (OR, 2.508; 95% CI, 1.062-5.920, p=0.036), vancomycin (OR, 2.882; 95% CI, 1.130-7.349, p=0.027), piperacillin-tazobactam (OR, 6.425; 95% CI, 2.187-18.875, p=0.001), and imipenem (OR, 3.580; 95% CI, 1.252-10.245, p=0.017) treatment within the 14 days before isolation of IRPA were independently associated with imipenem resistance. It was concluded that treatment with imipenem, vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam were major risk factors for IRPA infections in hospitalized patients. The nosocomial occurrence of IRPA was also strongly related to the duration of hospital stay, arterial catheter administration.
本研究的目的是确定耐亚胺培南铜绿假单胞菌(IRPA)医院感染的危险因素。2004年1月至12月在安卡拉的一家三级护理医院进行了一项前瞻性病例对照研究。纳入医院获得性铜绿假单胞菌感染的患者。将IRPA感染患者的特征与亚胺培南敏感铜绿假单胞菌(ISPA)感染患者的特征进行比较。仅考虑首次分离出的铜绿假单胞菌。医院感染根据疾病控制中心(CDC)标准定义。在研究期间,从75例(44.1%)患者中分离出IRPA,从95例(55.9%)患者中分离出ISPA。IRPA最常从气管内吸出物(19%)培养物中分离出来(p=0.048),而ISPA最常从尿液(28%)培养物中分离出来(p=0.023)。在多变量分析中,在分离出IRPA前14天内,铜绿假单胞菌分离前住院时间较长(比值比[OR],1.027;95%置信区间[CI],1.002 - 1.054,p=0.034)、动脉导管给药(OR,2.508;95%CI,1.062 - 5.9