Suppr超能文献

迷走神经刺激器感染的管理:它们需要被移除吗?

Management of vagal nerve stimulator infections: do they need to be removed?

作者信息

Air Ellen L, Ghomri Yashar M, Tyagi Rachana, Grande Andrew W, Crone Kerry, Mangano Francesco T

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009 Jan;3(1):73-8. doi: 10.3171/2008.10.PEDS08294.

Abstract

OBJECT

Vagal nerve stimulators (VNSs) have been used successfully to treat medically refractory epilepsy. Although their efficacy is well established, appropriate management of infections is less clearly defined. In the authors' experience, patients who have gained a benefit from VNS implantation have been reluctant to have the device removed. The authors therefore sought conservative management options to salvage infected VNS systems.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of 191 (93 female and 98 male) consecutive patients in whom VNS systems were placed between 2000 and 2007.

RESULTS

They identified 10 infections (5.2%). In 9 of 10 patients the cultured organism was Staphylococcus aureus. Three (30%) of 10 patients underwent early removal (within 1 month) of the VNS as the initial treatment. The remaining 7 patients were initially treated with antibiotics. Two (28.6%) of these patients were successfully treated using antibiotics without VNS removal. Patients in whom conservative treatment failed were given cephalexin as first-line antibiotic treatment. All patients recovered completely regardless of treatment regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the low rate of infection associated with VNS placement and suggests that, in the case of infection, treatment without removal is a viable option. However, the authors' data suggest that oral antibiotics are not the best first-line therapy.

摘要

目的

迷走神经刺激器(VNS)已成功用于治疗药物难治性癫痫。尽管其疗效已得到充分证实,但对于感染的恰当处理仍不太明确。根据作者的经验,从VNS植入中获益的患者不愿移除该装置。因此,作者寻求保守的处理方法来挽救感染的VNS系统。

方法

作者对2000年至2007年间连续植入VNS系统的191例患者(93例女性和98例男性)进行了回顾性研究。

结果

他们发现了10例感染(5.2%)。10例患者中有9例培养出的微生物是金黄色葡萄球菌。10例患者中有3例(30%)作为初始治疗在早期(1个月内)移除了VNS。其余7例患者最初接受抗生素治疗。其中2例(28.6%)患者使用抗生素治疗成功,未移除VNS。保守治疗失败的患者给予头孢氨苄作为一线抗生素治疗。无论采用何种治疗方案,所有患者均完全康复。

结论

本研究证实了VNS植入相关感染的发生率较低,并表明在感染情况下,不移除装置进行治疗是一种可行的选择。然而,作者的数据表明口服抗生素并非最佳的一线治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验