Suppr超能文献

成人右侧迷走神经刺激治疗耐药性癫痫。

Treatment of refractory epilepsy in adult patients with right-sided vagus nerve stimulation.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, La Princesa University Hospital, C/Diego de León 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2010 Jun;90(1-2):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 21.

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was introduced as a novel method for the treatment of patients with medically and/or surgically refractory epilepsy. VNS typically involves placement of the electrode on the left vagus nerve. However, there are some patients who cannot be implanted on this side because of complications related to the surgical procedure or side effects or infections forcing the left side VNS (L-VNS) explant. Because right side VNS (R-VNS) implants have shown similar effectiveness compared to L-VNS in reducing the frequency of seizures in animal models, treatment with R-VNS should be considered in patients who may not tolerate L-VNS. We present two adult patients who underwent R-VNS. One of the patients improved dramatically after L-VNS, but the device had to be removed because of mechanical malfunction. This patient was thought to be at high risk for nerve injury if L-VNS reimplantation was done, thus R-VNS was chosen. In the other patient, L-VNS was first attempted, but the operation had to be stopped due to significant bleeding caused by the accidental tearing of an ectopic vein. Both patients had a marked reduction in their seizure activity and none of them had cardiac side effects from therapeutic R-VNS. We conclude that R-VNS therapy is an alternative, promising therapy for reducing seizure activity in those patients who cannot undergo L-VNS implantation. Close follow-up and frequent ECG monitoring is required to detect the presence of cardiac side effects.

摘要

迷走神经刺激(Vagus nerve stimulation,VNS)作为一种治疗药物和/或手术难治性癫痫的新方法被引入。VNS 通常涉及将电极放置在左侧迷走神经上。然而,由于与手术过程相关的并发症、副作用或感染,有些患者不能在这一侧植入电极,需要将左侧迷走神经刺激(left vagus nerve stimulation,L-VNS)设备取出。由于右侧迷走神经刺激(right vagus nerve stimulation,R-VNS)植入在动物模型中显示出与 L-VNS 相似的降低癫痫发作频率的效果,因此对于不能耐受 L-VNS 的患者,应考虑使用 R-VNS 进行治疗。我们介绍了两位接受 R-VNS 治疗的成年患者。其中一位患者在接受 L-VNS 治疗后明显改善,但由于设备出现机械故障,不得不将其取出。如果再次进行 L-VNS 植入,该患者存在较高的神经损伤风险,因此选择了 R-VNS。另一位患者首先尝试了 L-VNS,但由于异位静脉意外撕裂导致大量出血,手术不得不停止。两位患者的癫痫发作活动均明显减少,且均未出现治疗性 R-VNS 的心脏副作用。我们得出结论,R-VNS 治疗是一种替代方法,对于那些不能进行 L-VNS 植入的患者,它可以作为一种有前途的减少癫痫发作活动的治疗方法。需要密切随访和频繁进行心电图监测,以检测心脏副作用的发生。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验