Clark W F, Parbtani A, Philbrick D J, Holub B J, Huff M W
Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1991 Jun;1(12):1343-53. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1121343.
It has been proposed that fish oil dietary supplementation in the chronic rat 5/6 renal ablation model may be either protective or toxic. These conflicting hypotheses were tested in rats who underwent renal ablation or sham surgery. Twenty rats received sham surgery, and 40 received 5/6 renal ablation. All rats were fed a regular laboratory diet up to 1 week postsurgery. At that time, one half of the renal ablation group was provided with an isocaloric diet supplemented with 24% MaxEPA (fish oil), 1% safflower oil, and antioxidants. The renal ablation rats developed hypertension, albuminuria, gammaglobulinuria, and a decline in glomerular filtration rate, which was less in the fish oil group compared with that in the regular laboratory diet group at 10 and 20 wk postsurgery. The fish oil renal ablation rats had significantly less glomerulosclerosis than did the regular laboratory diet renal ablation animals, and no more glomerular fibrin deposition than did the sham controls. The renal ablation regular laboratory diet rats had a significant dyslipidemia at 20 wk which was prevented in the fish oil renal ablation cohort. The fish oil renal ablation rats also demonstrated a significant decline in renal tissue arachidonic acid incorporation and a concomitant increase in eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid incorporation. The mortality of the renal ablation group was greater than that of the sham controls but not significantly different for the fish oil or the regular laboratory diet groups. These results support the hypothesis that the fish oil diet containing specific antioxidant, vitamin E, and essential fatty acid supplementation is protective in the rat remnant nephron model and prevents the evolution of glomerulosclerosis with associated renal functional impairment, while preserving glomerular filtration.
有人提出,在慢性大鼠5/6肾切除模型中补充鱼油饮食可能具有保护作用或毒性。在接受肾切除或假手术的大鼠中对这些相互矛盾的假设进行了检验。20只大鼠接受假手术,40只接受5/6肾切除。所有大鼠在术后1周内均喂食常规实验室饮食。那时,肾切除组的一半大鼠被给予一种等热量饮食,该饮食补充了24%的MaxEPA(鱼油)、1%的红花油和抗氧化剂。肾切除大鼠出现了高血压、蛋白尿、γ球蛋白尿以及肾小球滤过率下降,与术后10周和20周时常规实验室饮食组相比,鱼油组的下降程度较小。与常规实验室饮食的肾切除动物相比,鱼油肾切除大鼠的肾小球硬化明显较少,且与假手术对照组相比,肾小球纤维蛋白沉积并不更多。常规实验室饮食的肾切除大鼠在20周时出现了明显的血脂异常,而在鱼油肾切除组中这种情况得到了预防。鱼油肾切除大鼠还表现出肾组织花生四烯酸掺入显著下降,同时二十碳五烯酸和二十二碳六烯酸掺入增加。肾切除组的死亡率高于假手术对照组,但鱼油组和常规实验室饮食组之间没有显著差异。这些结果支持了这样一种假设,即含有特定抗氧化剂、维生素E和必需脂肪酸补充剂的鱼油饮食在大鼠残余肾单位模型中具有保护作用,并能预防肾小球硬化及相关肾功能损害的进展,同时保持肾小球滤过。