Park Byung-Ha, Lee Moo-Sik, Hong Jee-Young, Bae Seok-Hwan, Kim Eun-Young, Kim Kwang-Kee, Kim Dae-Kyoung
Department of Public Health, Gradualte School, Inje University, Gimhae, Republic of Korea.
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2009 Jan;21(1):71-83. doi: 10.1177/1010539508327089. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
This research aims to verify whether it is possible to explain the health-promoting behaviors based on sociodemographic characteristics by integrating the theory of planned behavior (TPB) proposed by Ajzen in 1988 and the transtheoretical model (TTM) proposed by Prochaska and DiClemente in 1983. In particular, the aim was to verify whether the variables of the TPB can properly distinguish the stages of change in exercise in the proposed integrated model and to figure out how attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavior control, influence, and intention-can explain the stages of change in exercise. Investigators who have taken previous training for the survey visited and interviewed 3658 people older than 30 years in the chosen town by multistage sampling method from July 27 to July 31, 2003. After the exclusion of inappropriate data out of 760 participants, only data from 584 participants were used for this research. chi2 test, t test, and 1-way analysis of variance were used to identify the difference between the distribution of the stages of change in exercise and the variables of the means. A discriminant analysis to verify the accuracy of the stages of change in exercise by means of the variables of the TPB and a path analysis to verify the fit of the integrated model were also used. The variables of the TPB were useful to satisfactorily distinguish and predict the stages of change in exercise. But to clarify the validity of this model, more diversified research should be conducted in the future, and the results must be accumulated.
本研究旨在通过整合1988年阿詹提出的计划行为理论（TPB）和1983年普罗查斯卡和迪克莱门特提出的跨理论模型（TTM），验证是否有可能基于社会人口学特征来解释健康促进行为。具体而言，目的是验证TPB的变量能否在提出的整合模型中正确区分运动改变阶段，并弄清楚态度、主观规范、感知行为控制、影响和意图如何解释运动改变阶段。接受过先前调查培训的研究人员于2003年7月27日至7月31日通过多阶段抽样方法访问并采访了选定城镇中3658名30岁以上的人。在排除760名参与者中的不适当数据后，本研究仅使用了584名参与者的数据。使用卡方检验、t检验和单因素方差分析来确定运动改变阶段的分布与均值变量之间的差异。还使用了判别分析来通过TPB的变量验证运动改变阶段的准确性，并使用路径分析来验证整合模型的拟合度。TPB的变量有助于令人满意地区分和预测运动改变阶段。但为了阐明该模型的有效性，未来应进行更多样化的研究，并积累结果。
