Millar John, McNamee Paul, Heaney David, Selvaraj Sivasubramaniam, Bond Christine, Lindsay Sandra, Morton Mary
Dingwall Medical Group-Health Centre, Ferry Road, Dingwall, Ross-Shire, UK.
Fam Pract. 2009 Apr;26(2):163-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn100. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
In view of the increasing cost of general practice of drug prescribing, it is important to look at ways of reducing drug wastage and thereby improve the cost-effectiveness of prescribing.
To determine the costs and cost savings to the NHS of instalment dispensing for newly prescribed medicines and to quantify the extra costs incurred by patients.
Patients were randomized to receive either a normal (n = 103) or an instalment (n = 101) prescription.
The difference between prescribed and dispensed drug costs in the intervention group was 0.98 UK pounds per patient (95% confidence interval 0.14-1.82 UK pounds), giving a 7% reduction in drug costs. The costs of the additional pharmacy time required to implement the intervention was calculated to be 5.02 UK pounds per patient.
Introduction of a system of instalment dispensing produced savings in the general practice of drugs bill, but these were not large enough to offset additional costs for pharmacists.
鉴于全科医疗中药物处方的成本不断增加,研究减少药物浪费的方法从而提高处方的成本效益非常重要。
确定国民保健制度(NHS)对新开具药物进行分期配药的成本和节省的费用,并量化患者产生的额外费用。
将患者随机分为接受常规处方(n = 103)或分期处方(n = 101)两组。
干预组中处方药物成本与配药药物成本之间的差异为每位患者0.98英镑(95%置信区间为0.14 - 1.82英镑),药物成本降低了7%。实施干预所需额外药房时间的成本计算为每位患者5.02英镑。
引入分期配药系统在全科医疗的药物账单方面产生了节省,但这些节省不足以抵消药剂师的额外成本。