Bekker C L, van den Bemt B J F, Egberts A C G, Bouvy M L, Gardarsdottir H
Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division Laboratories and Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Jun;40(3):704-711. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0642-8. Epub 2018 May 2.
Background Knowledge on factors related to preventable medication waste and waste-reducing interventions, including redispensing unused medications, is needed to maximise effectiveness. Objective To assess patient and medication factors associated with preventable medication waste and possibilities for redispensing unused medications. Setting Dutch community pharmacies. Methods In this cross-sectional study, pharmacy-staff registered patient and medication characteristics of prescription medications returned to 41 Dutch community pharmacies during 1 week in 2014. Medications were classified as preventable waste if the remaining amount could have been prevented and as theoretically eligible for redispensing if the package was unopened, undamaged and ≥ 6 months until the expiry date. Associations were analysed using multivariate logistic regression. Main outcome measures Proportion of medications classified as preventable waste and as eligible for redispensing, including factors associated with these medications. Results Overall, 279 persons returned 759 (low-cost) medications, and 39.3% was classified as preventable waste. These medications were more frequently used by men than women (OR; 1.7[1.2-2.3]) and by older (> 65 years) than younger patients (OR; 1.4[1.0-2.0]). Medications dispensed for longer periods were more often unnecessary wasted (1-3 months OR; 1.8[1.1-3.0], > 3 months 3.2[1.5-6.9]). Of all returned medications, 19.1% was eligible for redispensing. These medications were more frequently used by men than women (OR; 1.9[1.3-2.9]). Medications chronically used were more frequently eligible for redispensing than acute use (OR; 2.1[1.0-4.3]), and used for longer periods (1-3 months OR; 4.6[2.3-8.9], > 3 months 7.8[3.3-18.5]). Conclusions Over one-third of waste due to medications returned to community pharmacies can be prevented. One-fifth of returned medications can be redispensed, but this seems less interesting from an economic viewpoint.
为了实现最大效果,需要了解与可预防的药物浪费及减少浪费干预措施相关的因素的背景知识,包括重新调配未使用的药物。目的评估与可预防的药物浪费相关的患者和药物因素,以及重新调配未使用药物的可能性。地点荷兰社区药房。方法在这项横断面研究中,药房工作人员记录了2014年某一周内返还至41家荷兰社区药房的处方药的患者和药物特征。如果剩余药量本可避免,则将药物归类为可预防的浪费;如果包装未开封、未损坏且距离有效期≥6个月,则理论上有资格重新调配。使用多变量逻辑回归分析相关性。主要结局指标归类为可预防浪费和有资格重新调配的药物比例,包括与这些药物相关的因素。结果总体而言,279人返还了759种(低成本)药物,其中39.3%被归类为可预防的浪费。这些药物男性使用频率高于女性(比值比[OR];1.7[1.2 - 2.3]),老年(>65岁)患者使用频率高于年轻患者(OR;1.4[1.0 - 2.0])。调配时间较长的药物更常被不必要地浪费(1 - 3个月OR;1.8[1.1 - 3.0],>3个月3.2[1.5 - 6.9])。在所有返还的药物中,19.1%有资格重新调配。这些药物男性使用频率高于女性(OR;1.9[1.3 - 2.9])。长期使用的药物比急性使用的药物更常符合重新调配条件(OR;2.1[1.0 - 4.3]),且使用时间更长(1 - 3个月OR;4.6[2.3 - 8.9],>3个月7.8[3.3 - 18.5])。结论返还至社区药房的药物导致的浪费中,超过三分之一是可以预防的。五分之一的返还药物可以重新调配,但从经济角度来看,这似乎不太划算。