Miller Paul
Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2009 Summer;14(3):344-61. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enn044. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
The main objective of this study was to unveil similarities and differences in the word reading strategies of orally raised individuals with prelingual deafness and hearing individuals. Relevant data were gathered by a computerized research paradigm asking participants to make rapid same/different judgments for words. There were three distinct study conditions: (a) a visual condition manipulating the visual-perceptional properties of the target word pairs, (b) a phonological condition manipulating their phonological properties, and (c) a control condition. Participants were 31 high school and postgraduate students with prelingual deafness and 59 hearing students (the control group). Analysis of response latencies and accuracy in the three study conditions suggests that the word reading strategies the groups relied upon to process the stimulus materials were of the same nature. Evidence further suggests that prelingual deafness does not undermine the efficiency with which readers use these strategies. To gain a broader understanding of the obtained evidence, participants' performance in the word processing experiment was correlated with their phonemic awareness-the hypothesized hallmark of proficient word reading-and their reading comprehension skills. Findings are discussed with reference to a reading theory that assigns phonology a central role in proficient word reading.
本研究的主要目的是揭示先天性失聪的口语学习者与听力正常者在单词阅读策略上的异同。通过计算机化研究范式收集相关数据,要求参与者对单词做出快速的相同/不同判断。有三种不同的研究条件:(a) 视觉条件,操纵目标单词对的视觉感知属性;(b) 语音条件,操纵其语音属性;(c) 控制条件。参与者包括31名先天性失聪的高中生和研究生以及59名听力正常的学生(对照组)。对三种研究条件下的反应潜伏期和准确性的分析表明,两组在处理刺激材料时所依赖的单词阅读策略本质相同。证据进一步表明,先天性失聪不会削弱读者使用这些策略的效率。为了更全面地理解所获得的证据,将参与者在单词处理实验中的表现与其音素意识(熟练单词阅读的假设标志)和阅读理解技能进行了关联。参考一种将语音学置于熟练单词阅读核心地位的阅读理论对研究结果进行了讨论。