McManus Julie Ann, Craig Alison, McAlpine Christine, Langhorne Peter, Ellis Graham
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow.
Clin Rehabil. 2009 Feb;23(2):99-105. doi: 10.1177/0269215508095874. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
Little is known about the long-term effectiveness after stroke of interventions for behaviour modification and ensuring concordance with therapies. We describe a follow-up study of a previous randomized controlled trial of a brief period of behaviour modification. The aim of this study was to determine outcomes three years after the initial intervention.
Survivors of the original cohort were contacted and asked to attend for follow-up interview, within a geriatric day hospital. This study was carried out in the Geriatric Day Hospital at Stobhill Hospital, Balornock Road, Glasgow.
Details of risk factor control, including blood pressure, cholesterol levels and diabetic control, were assessed. Questionnaires used in the initial study were repeated including the Geriatric Depression Scale score, Euroqol Perceived Health Status and Stroke Services Satisfaction Questionnaire.
Primary outcome was collective risk factor control. Clinical outcomes including recurrent cerebrovascular events, medication persistence and perceived health status were also recorded.
Mean length of follow-up was 3.6 years (SD 0.43). Of the 205 patients enrolled in the initial study, 102 patients attended for repeat interview(49 intervention/53 control). There were no significant differences in the percentage of controlled risk factors between groups (intervention 51.7% versus control 55.9%, P = 0.53). Similarities were observed in the number of recurrent clinical events and medication persistence between groups. No overall difference was observed in perceived health status, satisfaction with care or depression scores.
Brief intervention with respect to behaviour modification and risk factor control does not appear to have any long-term benefit. These results must be cautiously interpreted in light of the small study number and further research is required.
对于行为改变及确保治疗依从性的干预措施在中风后的长期效果,人们了解甚少。我们描述了一项针对先前短期行为改变随机对照试验的随访研究。本研究的目的是确定初始干预三年后的结果。
联系了原始队列的幸存者,并要求他们在老年日间医院接受随访访谈。本研究在格拉斯哥巴洛诺克路斯托比尔医院的老年日间医院进行。
评估了危险因素控制的细节,包括血压、胆固醇水平和糖尿病控制情况。重复使用了初始研究中使用的问卷,包括老年抑郁量表评分、欧洲生活质量感知健康状况和中风服务满意度问卷。
主要结果是综合危险因素控制。还记录了临床结果,包括复发性脑血管事件、药物持续使用情况和感知健康状况。
平均随访时间为3.6年(标准差0.43)。在初始研究纳入的205名患者中,102名患者参加了重复访谈(49名干预组/53名对照组)。两组之间危险因素控制的百分比没有显著差异(干预组51.7%对对照组55.9%,P = 0.53)。两组在复发性临床事件数量和药物持续使用情况方面观察到相似之处。在感知健康状况、护理满意度或抑郁评分方面未观察到总体差异。
关于行为改变和危险因素控制的简短干预似乎没有任何长期益处。鉴于研究数量较少,这些结果必须谨慎解释,还需要进一步研究。