Barreto Andrew D, Martin-Schild Sheryl, Hallevi Hen, Morales Miriam M, Abraham Anitha T, Gonzales Nicole R, Illoh Kachi, Grotta James C, Savitz Sean I
Stroke Division, Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, USA.
Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3):827-32. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.528034. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
Approximately 25% of ischemic stroke patients awaken with their deficits. The last-seen-normal time is defined as the time the patient went to sleep, which places these patients outside the window for thrombolysis. The purpose of this study was to describe our center's experience with off-label, compassionate thrombolysis for wake-up stroke (WUS) patients.
A retrospective review of our database identified 3 groups of ischemic stroke patients: (1) WUS treated with thrombolysis; (2) nontreated WUS; and (3) 0- to 3-hour intravenous tissue plasminogen activator-treated patients. Safety and clinical outcome measures were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, excellent outcome (discharge modified Rankin score, 0-1), favorable outcome (modified Rankin score, 0-2), and mortality. Outcome measures were controlled for baseline NIHSS using logistic regression.
Forty-six thrombolysed and 34 nonthrombolysed WUS patients were identified. Sixty-one percent (28/46) of the treated WUS patients underwent intravenous thrombolysis alone whereas 30% (14/46) were given only intra-arterial thrombolysis. Four patients received both intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis (9%). Two symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages occurred in treated WUS (4.3%). Controlling for NIHSS imbalance, treated WUS had higher rates of excellent (14% vs 6%; P=0.06) and favorable outcome (28% vs 13%; P=0.006), but higher mortality (15% vs 0%) compared to nontreated WUS. A second comparison controlling for baseline NIHSS between treated WUS and 174 intravenous tissue plasminogen activator patients treated within 3 hours of symptoms showed no significant differences in safety and clinical outcomes.
Thrombolysis may be safe in WUS patients. Our center's experience supports considering a prospective, randomized trial to assess the safety and outcome of thrombolysis for this specific patient population.
约25%的缺血性卒中患者醒来时即存在神经功能缺损。末次正常时间定义为患者入睡时间,这使得这些患者超出了溶栓治疗的时间窗。本研究的目的是描述我们中心对醒后卒中(WUS)患者进行超说明书、同情性溶栓治疗的经验。
对我们的数据库进行回顾性分析,确定了3组缺血性卒中患者:(1)接受溶栓治疗的WUS患者;(2)未接受治疗的WUS患者;(3)症状出现0至3小时内接受静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗的患者。安全性和临床结局指标包括症状性脑出血、良好结局(出院时改良Rankin量表评分,0至1分)、有利结局(改良Rankin量表评分,0至2分)和死亡率。使用逻辑回归对基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)进行校正后分析结局指标。
共确定了46例接受溶栓治疗的WUS患者和34例未接受溶栓治疗的WUS患者。接受治疗的WUS患者中,61%(28/46)仅接受了静脉溶栓,而30%(14/46)仅接受了动脉内溶栓。4例患者同时接受了静脉和动脉内溶栓(9%)。接受治疗的WUS患者中发生了2例症状性脑出血(4.3%)。校正NIHSS不平衡后,与未接受治疗的WUS患者相比,接受治疗的WUS患者有更高的良好结局发生率(14%对6%;P=0.06)和有利结局发生率(28%对13%;P=0.006),但死亡率更高(15%对0%)。在接受治疗的WUS患者与174例症状出现3小时内接受静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗的患者之间进行的第二项校正基线NIHSS的比较显示,安全性和临床结局无显著差异。
溶栓治疗对WUS患者可能是安全的。我们中心的经验支持考虑开展一项前瞻性随机试验,以评估针对这一特定患者群体进行溶栓治疗的安全性和结局。