Suppr超能文献

Evidence for age-related changes to temporal attention and memory from the choice time production task.

作者信息

Gooch Cynthia M, Stern Yaakov, Rakitin Brian C

机构信息

Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, Taub Institute, Columbia University, New York, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2009 May;16(3):285-310. doi: 10.1080/13825580802592771. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

Abstract

The effect of aging on interval timing was examined using a choice time production task, which required participants to choose a key response based on the location of the stimulus, but to delay responding until after a learned time interval. Experiment 1 varied attentional demands of the response choice portion of the task by varying difficulty of stimulus-response mapping. Choice difficulty affected temporal accuracy equally in both age groups, but older participants' response latencies were more variable under more difficult response choice conditions. Experiment 2 tested the contribution of long-term memory to differences in choice time production between age groups over 3 days of testing. Direction of errors in time production between the two age groups diverged over the 3 sessions, but variability did not differ. Results from each experiment separately show age-related changes to attention and memory in temporal processing using different measures and manipulations in the same task.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evidence for age-related changes to temporal attention and memory from the choice time production task.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2009 May;16(3):285-310. doi: 10.1080/13825580802592771. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
2
Aging and working memory inside and outside the focus of attention: dissociations of availability and accessibility.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2008 Nov;15(6):703-24. doi: 10.1080/13825580802061645. Epub 2008 May 16.
4
Level of uncertainty and brain damage: a reaction time test of attention for clinical use.
Int J Neurosci. 1988 Jun;40(3-4):153-65. doi: 10.3109/00207458808990708.
5
Effects of spatial and nonspatial memory tasks on choice stepping reaction time in older people.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Oct;63(10):1063-8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.10.1063.
6
Selective influence of working memory load on exceptionally slow reaction times.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Oct;143(5):1837-60. doi: 10.1037/a0037190. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
7
The effects of aging and dual task demands on language production.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2009 May;16(3):241-59. doi: 10.1080/13825580802438868. Epub 2008 Nov 3.
9
Divided versus selective attention: evidence for common processing mechanisms.
Brain Res. 2008 Jun 18;1215:137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.058. Epub 2008 Apr 7.
10
Aging and prospective memory: the role of working memory and monitoring processes.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008 Dec;20(6):569-77. doi: 10.1007/BF03324886.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptually plausible Bayesian inference in interval timing.
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Aug 18;8(8):201844. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201844. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Temporal context effects are associated with cognitive status in advanced age.
Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):512-521. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01502-9. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
3
Heterogeneous Indicators of Cognitive Performance and Performance Variability Across the Lifespan.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Mar 6;12:62. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00062. eCollection 2020.
4
Cognitive Aging and Time Perception: Roles of Bayesian Optimization and Degeneracy.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 May 18;8:102. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00102. eCollection 2016.
5
Analysis of Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors Influencing Timing and Time Perception.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 7;10(12):e0143873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143873. eCollection 2015.
7
Age differences in intra-individual variability in simple and choice reaction time: systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045759. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
8
The role of rat dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in spatial working memory.
Neuroscience. 2009 Dec 1;164(2):444-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time.
Behav Processes. 1998 Dec;44(2):127-45. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(98)00045-x.
2
Effects of feedback on time production errors in aging participants.
Brain Res Bull. 2008 Jan 31;75(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.07.014. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
3
Age-related differences in timing with breaks.
Psychol Aging. 2007 Jun;22(2):398-403. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.398.
4
Age-related changes in duration reproduction: involvement of working memory processes.
Brain Cogn. 2006 Oct;62(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 12.
6
Single-dose levodopa administration and aging independently disrupt time production.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Mar;18(3):376-87. doi: 10.1162/089892906775990615.
7
A firing rate model of Parkinsonian deficits in interval timing.
Brain Res. 2006 Jan 27;1070(1):189-201. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.070. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
8
Differential involvement of internal clock and working memory in the production and reproduction of duration: a study on older adults.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Mar;121(3):285-96. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
9
The effects of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on choice time production accuracy and variability.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Aug;31(4):685-702. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.685.
10
Age-related differences in executive control of working memory.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1333-45. doi: 10.3758/bf03206324.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验