Suppr超能文献

使用各种根管预备技术后根管内细菌的根尖部挤出

Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.

作者信息

Kuştarci A, Akpinar K E, Sümer Z, Er K, Bek B

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2008 Dec;41(12):1066-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01470.x.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the number of bacteria extruded apically from extracted teeth ex vivo after canal instrumentation using a manual technique and three engine-driven techniques utilizing nickel-titanium instruments (K3, RaCe, and FlexMaster).

METHODOLOGY

Seventy extracted human mandibular premolar teeth with similar dimensions were used. Access cavities were prepared and root canals were then contaminated with a suspension of Enterococcus faecalis and then dried. The contaminated roots were divided into four experimental groups of 15 teeth each and one control group of 10 teeth. G1. RaCe group: the root canals were instrumented using RaCe instruments. G2. K3 group: the root canals were instrumented using K3 instruments. G3. FlexMaster group: the root canals were instrumented using FlexMaster instruments. G4. Manual technique group: the root canals were instrumented using K-type stainless steel instruments. G5.

CONTROL GROUP

no instrumentation was attempted. Bacteria extruded from the apical foramen during instrumentation were collected into vials. The resultant microbiological samples were removed from the vials and then incubated in culture media for 24 h. The number of colony-forming units (CFU) was determined for each sample. The data obtained were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U-tests, with alpha = 0.05 as the level for statistical significance.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between experimental-control and engine-driven-manual technique groups (P < 0.05). The manual technique was associated with the greatest extrusion of microorganism.

CONCLUSIONS

All instrumentation techniques extruded intracanal bacteria apically. No significant difference was found in the number of CFU among the engine-driven techniques; manual techniques extruded significantly more microorganisms.

摘要

目的

评估使用手动技术和三种使用镍钛器械(K3、RaCe和FlexMaster)的机用技术进行根管预备后,离体拔除牙根尖挤出的细菌数量。

方法

使用70颗尺寸相似的拔除人类下颌前磨牙。制备开髓腔,然后用粪肠球菌悬液污染根管,随后干燥。将受污染的牙根分为四个实验组,每组15颗牙,一个对照组,每组10颗牙。G1. RaCe组:使用RaCe器械进行根管预备。G2. K3组:使用K3器械进行根管预备。G3. FlexMaster组:使用FlexMaster器械进行根管预备。G4. 手动技术组:使用K型不锈钢器械进行根管预备。G5. 对照组:不进行预备。预备过程中从根尖孔挤出的细菌收集到小瓶中。将所得微生物样本从小瓶中取出,然后在培养基中培养24小时。测定每个样本的菌落形成单位(CFU)数量。使用Kruskal-Wallis单向方差分析和Mann-Whitney U检验对获得的数据进行分析,以α = 0.05作为统计学显著性水平。

结果

实验组与对照组以及机用技术组与手动技术组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。手动技术与最大量的微生物挤出相关。

结论

所有预备技术都会使根管内细菌向根尖挤出。在机用技术之间,CFU数量未发现显著差异;手动技术挤出的微生物明显更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验