• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌前磨牙根管预备时手动器械与旋转器械根尖部碎屑排出的体外比较

In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments.

作者信息

Soi Sonal, Yadav Suman, Sharma Sumeet, Sharma Mohit

机构信息

Reader, I.T.S Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre, Greater Noida, India.

Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Guru Gobind Tricentenary Dental College, Research Center and Hospital, Gurgaon, India.

出版信息

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015 Summer;9(3):131-7. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2015.026. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

DOI:10.15171/joddd.2015.026
PMID:26697144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4682008/
Abstract

Background and aims. During root canal preparation, debris extruded beyond the apical foramen may result in periapical inflammation and postoperative pain. To date no root canal preparation method has been developed that extrudes no periapical debris. The purpose of this study was to identify a system leading to minimal extrusion of debris from the apical foramen. The study was conducted to comparatively evaluate the amount of apical extrusion of debris during root canal preparation using hand ProTaper and GT rotary and RaCe rotary instruments using crown-down technique. Materials and methods. Ninety freshly extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were equally assigned to three groups (n=30). The root canals were instrumented using hand ProTaper, GT rotary and RaCe rotary systems. Debris and irrigant extruded from the apical foramen were collected into vials. The mean weight of the remaining debris was calculated for each group and subjected to statistical analysis. Results. ANOVA was used to compare the mean dry weights of the debris extruded in the three groups, followedby post hoc Tukey tests for multiple comparisons the between groups. Highly significant differences were found in the amount of debris extruded among all the groups (P<0.001). The ProTaper group exhibited the highest mean debris weight (0.8293±0.05433 mg) and the RaCe system exhibited the lowest mean debris weight (0.1280±0.01606 mg). Conclusion. All the systems tested resulted in apical extrusion of debris. However, the hand ProTaper files extruded a significantly higher amount of debris than GT and RaCe systems.

摘要

背景与目的。在根管预备过程中,超出根尖孔挤出的碎屑可能导致根尖周炎和术后疼痛。迄今为止,尚未开发出一种不挤出根尖碎屑的根管预备方法。本研究的目的是确定一种使根尖孔碎屑挤出量最小的系统。本研究旨在比较评估使用冠向下技术,采用手用ProTaper、GT旋转器械和RaCe旋转器械进行根管预备时根尖碎屑的挤出量。材料与方法。将90颗新鲜拔除的人单根下颌前磨牙平均分为三组(n = 30)。使用手用ProTaper、GT旋转器械和RaCe旋转系统对根管进行预备操作。从根尖孔挤出的碎屑和冲洗液收集到小瓶中。计算每组剩余碎屑的平均重量,并进行统计分析。结果。采用方差分析比较三组挤出碎屑平均干重,并随后进行组间多重比较后的Tukey检验进行分析。所有组间在碎屑挤出量上均发现高度显著差异(P <0.001)。ProTaper组的平均碎屑重量最高(0.8293±0.0543 mg),而RaCe系统的平均碎屑重量最低(0.1280±0.0161 mg)。结论。所有测试系统均导致根尖碎屑挤出。然而,手用ProTaper锉挤出的碎屑量显著高于GT和RaCe系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a6/4682008/0adcc9668d5a/JODDD-9-131-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a6/4682008/22addf78be4c/JODDD-9-131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a6/4682008/0adcc9668d5a/JODDD-9-131-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a6/4682008/22addf78be4c/JODDD-9-131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a6/4682008/0adcc9668d5a/JODDD-9-131-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments.下颌前磨牙根管预备时手动器械与旋转器械根尖部碎屑排出的体外比较
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015 Summer;9(3):131-7. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2015.026. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
2
Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant with three rotary instruments using crown down technique - An in vitro study.使用冠向下技术对三种旋转器械的碎屑和冲洗液根尖挤出情况的比较评估——一项体外研究
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2012 May-Aug;2(2):105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
3
Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.使用ProTaper、D-RaCe和R-Endo旋转镍钛再治疗器械及手动锉去除根管充填材料时根尖挤出碎屑的评估。
J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):2066-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
4
Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.使用四种旋转器械系统对碎屑和冲洗液根尖挤出量的定量评估:一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Nov 1;14(6):1065-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1452.
5
Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.三种当代镍钛器械系统根尖部挤出碎屑的体外对比研究
Indian J Dent Res. 2008 Jul-Sep;19(3):182-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.42947.
6
A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems.使用Medin、RaCe和ProTaper旋转系统进行根管预备时碎屑根尖挤出情况的比较
J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Sep;22(3):193-197. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100.
7
Evaluation of apically extruded debris during the removal of canal filling material using three different Ni-Ti systems and hand files in teeth with simulated apical root resorption.评价三种不同镍钛器械系统和手用器械在有模拟根尖吸收根管内去除根管充填材料时的根尖碎屑推出量。
Int Endod J. 2020 Mar;53(3):403-409. doi: 10.1111/iej.13234. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
8
Evaluation of conventional, protaper hand and protaper rotary instrumentation system for apical extrusion of debris, irrigants and bacteria- An randomized trial.传统手用Protaper器械和Protaper旋转器械系统对碎屑、冲洗液及细菌根尖挤出影响的评估——一项随机试验。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Feb 1;9(2):e254-e258. doi: 10.4317/jced.53340. eCollection 2017 Feb.
9
Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files.使用三种不同的旋转系统和手动锉对乳磨牙根管预备过程中根尖挤出碎屑的评估。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;26(5):357-63. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12208. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
10
Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems.使用ProTaper通用型和ProTaper Next旋转系统进行碎屑的根尖挤出。
Int Endod J. 2015 Mar;48(3):283-6. doi: 10.1111/iej.12313. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Hybrid Hand Instrumentation Technique for Root Canal Preparation.一种用于根管预备的新型混合手动器械技术。
Iran Endod J. 2018 Fall;13(4):461-468. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i4.19179.
2
A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems.使用Medin、RaCe和ProTaper旋转系统进行根管预备时碎屑根尖挤出情况的比较
J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Sep;22(3):193-197. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100.
3
Comparison of Manual and Rotary Instrumentation on Postoperative Pain in Teeth with Asymptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant with three rotary instruments using crown down technique - An in vitro study.使用冠向下技术对三种旋转器械的碎屑和冲洗液根尖挤出情况的比较评估——一项体外研究
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2012 May-Aug;2(2):105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
2
A new method for real-time quantification of irrigant extrusion during root canal irrigation ex vivo.一种用于离体根管冲洗时实时定量分析冲洗剂挤出的新方法。
Int Endod J. 2013 Jul;46(7):619-31. doi: 10.1111/iej.12036. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
3
Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems − An in vitro study.
手动与旋转器械治疗无症状性不可逆性牙髓炎患牙术后疼痛的比较:一项随机临床试验
Iran Endod J. 2016 Fall;11(4):273-279. doi: 10.22037/iej.2016.4.
使用手动和三种旋转器械系统对碎屑和冲洗液进行根尖挤出的体外研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2010 Oct;1(4):234-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.76390.
4
Apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using hand and rotary systems: A comparative study.使用手动和旋转系统时碎屑与冲洗液的根尖挤出:一项对比研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2011 Apr;14(2):187-90. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.82622.
5
Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: a pilot study.使用不同螺距的旋转镍钛锉后碎屑的挤出:一项初步研究。
Aust Endod J. 2009 Aug;35(2):65-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2008.00128.x.
6
Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.使用各种根管预备技术后根管内细菌的根尖部挤出
Int Endod J. 2008 Dec;41(12):1066-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01470.x.
7
Apical transportation: a comparative evaluation of three root canal instrumentation techniques with three different apical diameters.根尖偏移:三种不同根尖直径的根管预备技术的比较评估
J Endod. 2008 Dec;34(12):1545-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.027. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
8
Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.三种当代镍钛器械系统根尖部挤出碎屑的体外对比研究
Indian J Dent Res. 2008 Jul-Sep;19(3):182-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.42947.
9
Flare-ups after endodontic treatment: a meta-analysis of literature.根管治疗后的病情复发:一项文献的荟萃分析
J Endod. 2008 Oct;34(10):1177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.016. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
10
Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.使用各种根管预备技术后根管内碎屑和冲洗液的根尖挤出。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Feb;105(2):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.028.