Suppr超能文献

一份用于三级医疗中心丛集性头痛筛查的简短自填式问卷的验证

Validation of a brief self-administered questionnaire for cluster headache screening in a tertiary center.

作者信息

Dousset Virginie, Laporte Alain, Legoff Mélanie, Traineau Marie-Hélène, Dartigues Jean-François, Brochet Bruno

机构信息

Centre Douleur Chronique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Headache. 2009 Jan;49(1):64-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01290.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cluster headache remains substantially underdiagnosed and undertreated. Early neurologic referral is indicated in patients with a suspected diagnosis of cluster headache (CH) so that management can be optimized and unnecessary procedures avoided.

OBJECTIVE

To validate a brief self-administered questionnaire designed to screen CH cases in tertiary centers.

METHODS

The review of clinical studies led us to identify the 3 more prevalent criteria of the second edition of the International Headache Society classification (International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition [ICHD II]) for all forms of CH (episodic and chronic forms). These 3 criteria were: strictly unilaterality of pain, attack duration <180 minutes if untreated, ipsilateral conjunctival injection, and/or lacrimation. These criteria were transformed in questions formulated in such a way that they could be self-administered and easily understood. Answer to each question was yes or no. Patients were unaided. The self-questionnaire was compared with the gold standard, the ICHD II criteria used by specialists at the university of Bordeaux headache center.We calculated the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 questions and for each pair of questions.

RESULTS

The self-questionnaire was consecutively and prospectively submitted to 37 patients with CH and 59 patients with migraine. The 3-item questionnaire had a 78.4% sensibility and a 100% specificity. The 2-item questionnaire only using the attack duration associated with conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation was more sensitive (81.1%) with the same specificity (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

This 2-item questionnaire could be a useful tool for screening CH cases in tertiary centers.

摘要

背景

丛集性头痛的诊断和治疗仍严重不足。对于疑似丛集性头痛(CH)的患者,建议尽早转诊至神经科,以便优化治疗方案并避免不必要的检查。

目的

验证一份简短的自填式问卷,用于在三级中心筛查丛集性头痛病例。

方法

通过对临床研究的回顾,我们确定了国际头痛协会第二版分类(《头痛疾病国际分类》第二版[ICHD-II])中所有形式丛集性头痛(发作性和慢性形式)的3个最常见标准。这3个标准是:疼痛严格单侧性、未经治疗时发作持续时间<180分钟、同侧结膜充血和/或流泪。这些标准被转化为易于理解的自填式问题。每个问题的答案为是或否。患者独立完成问卷。将该自填式问卷与波尔多大学头痛中心专家使用的ICHD-II标准这一金标准进行比较。我们计算了3个问题以及每对问题的敏感性和特异性。

结果

该自填式问卷连续前瞻性地应用于37例丛集性头痛患者和59例偏头痛患者。3项问卷的敏感性为78.4%,特异性为100%。仅使用发作持续时间与结膜充血和/或流泪相关的2项问卷敏感性更高(81.1%),特异性相同(100%)。

结论

这份2项问卷可能是三级中心筛查丛集性头痛病例的有用工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验