Suppr超能文献

基于网络的逐步式问卷用于诊断丛集性头痛:LUCA 和 QATCH。

Stepwise web-based questionnaires for diagnosing cluster headache: LUCA and QATCH.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2013 Aug;33(11):924-31. doi: 10.1177/0333102413479835. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cluster headache (CH) is a primary headache disorder that is diagnosed based on the patient's history. For large-scale epidemiologic and genetic studies, a web-based, preferably short, questionnaire can be a feasible alternative to replace time-consuming clinical interviews.

METHODS

Self-reported CH patients were enrolled via our research website. Participants meeting screening criteria were directed to the Leiden University Cluster headache Analysis program (LUCA) questionnaire. Individual diagnoses were calculated using an algorithm based on International Headache Society criteria. Subsequently, semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out to validate the LUCA questionnaire. The shorter Quick Ascertainment of Cluster Headache (QATCH) questionnaire for diagnosing CH was constructed by using logistic regression to select the most predictive questions.

RESULTS

Via our website 437 self-reported CH patients were recruited. Of these, 291 patients were included in this cross-sectional study. The LUCA questionnaire was valid and accurate. Using logistic regression, three questions (QATCH) provided similar sensitivity (53.8% vs. 57.2%), specificity (88.9% vs. 87.5%), positive predictive value (95.5% vs. 95.9%) and negative predictive value (30.8% vs. 28.8%) compared with the LUCA questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The web-based LUCA questionnaire was accurate and reliable in diagnosing CH among self-reported patients. Males with headache attacks of short duration and long headache-free intervals (months to years) are very likely to have CH.

摘要

背景

丛集性头痛(CH)是一种原发性头痛疾病,根据患者的病史进行诊断。对于大规模的流行病学和遗传学研究,基于网络的、最好是简短的问卷可以作为一种可行的替代方法,以取代耗时的临床访谈。

方法

通过我们的研究网站招募自我报告的 CH 患者。符合筛选标准的参与者被引导至莱顿大学丛集性头痛分析程序(LUCA)问卷。使用基于国际头痛协会标准的算法计算个体诊断。随后,进行半结构化电话访谈以验证 LUCA 问卷。通过使用逻辑回归选择最具预测性的问题,构建了用于诊断 CH 的更简短的快速丛集性头痛识别(QATCH)问卷。

结果

通过我们的网站招募了 437 名自我报告的 CH 患者。其中,291 名患者被纳入本横断面研究。LUCA 问卷是有效且准确的。使用逻辑回归,三个问题(QATCH)提供了相似的敏感性(53.8% 与 57.2%)、特异性(88.9% 与 87.5%)、阳性预测值(95.5% 与 95.9%)和阴性预测值(30.8% 与 28.8%),与 LUCA 问卷相当。

结论

在自我报告的患者中,基于网络的 LUCA 问卷在诊断 CH 方面是准确和可靠的。具有短持续时间和长无头痛期(数月至数年)的头痛发作的男性极有可能患有 CH。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验