Suppr超能文献

波士顿肠道准备量表:一种用于结肠镜检查相关研究的有效且可靠的工具。

The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research.

作者信息

Lai Edwin J, Calderwood Audrey H, Doros Gheorghe, Fix Oren K, Jacobson Brian C

机构信息

Section of Gastroenterology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few bowel-preparation rating scales have been validated. Most scales were intended for comparing oral purgatives and fail to account for washing and/or suctioning by the endoscopist. This limits their utility in studies of colonoscopy outcomes, such as polyp-detection rates.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a valid and reliable scale for use in colonoscopy outcomes research.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

METHODS

We developed the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), a 10-point scale that assesses bowel preparation after all cleansing maneuvers are completed by the endoscopist. We assessed interobserver and intraobserver reliability by using video footage of colonoscopies viewed on 2 separate occasions by 22 clinicians. We then applied the BBPS prospectively during screening colonoscopies and compared BBPS scores with clinically meaningful outcomes, including polyp-detection rates and procedure times.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient (a measure of interobserver reliability) for BBPS scores was 0.74. The weighted kappa (a measure of intraobserver reliability) for scores was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66-0.87). During 633 screening colonoscopies, the mean (SD) BBPS score was 6.0 +/- 1.6. Higher BBPS scores (> or =5 vs <5) were associated with a higher polyp-detection rate (40% vs 24%, P < .02). BBPS scores were inversely correlated with colonoscope insertion (r = -0.16, P < .003) and withdrawal (r = -0.23, P < .001) times.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

The BBPS is a valid and reliable measure of bowel preparation. It may be well suited to colonoscopy outcomes research because it reflects the colon's cleanliness during the inspection phase of the procedure.

摘要

背景

很少有肠道准备评分量表经过验证。大多数量表旨在比较口服泻药,未考虑内镜医师的冲洗和/或吸引操作。这限制了它们在结肠镜检查结果研究(如息肉检出率)中的效用。

目的

开发一种用于结肠镜检查结果研究的有效且可靠的量表。

地点

学术医疗中心。

方法

我们开发了波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS),这是一个10分制量表,在内镜医师完成所有清洁操作后评估肠道准备情况。我们通过使用22名临床医生在2个不同场合观看的结肠镜检查视频片段来评估观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。然后我们在筛查结肠镜检查中前瞻性地应用BBPS,并将BBPS评分与包括息肉检出率和操作时间在内的具有临床意义的结果进行比较。

结果

BBPS评分的组内相关系数(观察者间可靠性的一种度量)为0.74。评分的加权kappa(观察者内可靠性的一种度量)为0.77(95%CI,0.66 - 0.87)。在633例筛查结肠镜检查中,平均(标准差)BBPS评分为6.0±1.6。较高的BBPS评分(≥5分与<5分)与较高的息肉检出率相关(40%对24%,P<.02)。BBPS评分与结肠镜插入(r = -0.16,P<.003)和退出(r = -0.23,P<.001)时间呈负相关。

局限性

单中心研究。

结论

BBPS是一种有效且可靠的肠道准备度量方法。它可能非常适合结肠镜检查结果研究,因为它反映了检查过程中结肠的清洁程度。

相似文献

3
Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.波士顿肠道准备量表的综合验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.068.
4
Pilot validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale in China.在中国对波士顿肠道准备量表进行初步验证。
Dig Endosc. 2013 Mar;25(2):167-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01356.x. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
7
Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation.人工智能在肠道准备评估中的应用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Mar;95(3):512-518.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
8
Validated Scales for Colon Cleansing: A Systematic Review.结肠清洁的验证量表:系统评价
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):197-204; quiz 205. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.417. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;101(4):873-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00673.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验