Suppr超能文献

在筛查性乙状结肠镜检查中,肠道准备质量的判断与腺瘤检出率的变异性相关。

Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates.

作者信息

Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers P, Cooper S, Man R, Rutter M D, Suzuki N, Swain D, Thuraisingam A, Atkin W

机构信息

Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2006 May;38(5):456-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925259.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Adenoma detection rates (ADRs) at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy are known to vary between endoscopists. Variability in the technique used and in the quality of bowel preparation may explain this. The aim of this study was to establish whether there is a relationship between the grading of bowel preparation and the ADR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The relationship between the ADR and assessment of bowel preparation was examined using the full United Kingdom Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial data set (n = 38 601). The consistency of the bowel preparation classification was then investigated by six experienced endoscopists (video scorers), who examined 260 flexible sigmoidoscopy cases - 20 from each of the 13 trial endoscopists.

RESULTS

Overall, the ADR was significantly higher in flexible sigmoidoscopy examinations with excellent or good bowel preparation ( P = 0.02). However, endoscopists with a higher ADR coded a smaller proportion of their examinations as having excellent/good preparation ( P = 0.002). Video scorers agreed with the trial endoscopists' definition of bowel preparation in 48.9 % of the readings, but they scored the quality of preparation as poorer than the trial endoscopists in 36.4 % and 40.6 %, respectively, in the intermediate-performance group (10 % < ADR < 14 %) and lower-performance group (ADR </= 10 %) in comparison with only 12.9 % in the high-performance group (ADR > or =14 %). There was a significant linear trend between the proportion scored as having poor bowel preparation and the ADR ( P < 0.001), varying from 2.7 % in the higher-performance ADR group to 13.4 % in the lower-performance group.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopists with a higher ADR are more likely to be critical of the quality of bowel preparation. Training in judgement processes such as non-acceptance of suboptimal bowel preparation is required in order to ensure universally high standards in screening procedures.

摘要

背景与研究目的

已知在筛查性乙状结肠镜检查中,腺瘤检出率(ADR)在不同内镜医师之间存在差异。所使用的技术以及肠道准备质量的差异可能对此做出解释。本研究的目的是确定肠道准备分级与ADR之间是否存在关联。

材料与方法

使用完整的英国乙状结肠镜筛查试验数据集(n = 38601)来研究ADR与肠道准备评估之间的关系。然后由六位经验丰富的内镜医师(视频评分员)调查肠道准备分类的一致性,他们检查了260例乙状结肠镜检查病例——来自13位试验内镜医师中的每位各20例。

结果

总体而言,在肠道准备极佳或良好的乙状结肠镜检查中,ADR显著更高(P = 0.02)。然而,ADR较高的内镜医师将其检查中评为极佳/良好准备的比例更小(P = 0.002)。视频评分员在48.9%的读数中与试验内镜医师对肠道准备的定义一致,但在中等表现组(10% < ADR < 14%)和低表现组(ADR≤10%)中,他们分别将准备质量评为比试验内镜医师差36.4%和40.6%,而在高表现组(ADR≥14%)中这一比例仅为12.9%。被评为肠道准备差的比例与ADR之间存在显著的线性趋势(P < 0.001),从高表现ADR组的2.7%到低表现组中的13.4%不等。

结论

ADR较高的内镜医师更有可能对肠道准备质量持批评态度。为确保筛查程序达到普遍的高标准,需要进行诸如不接受次优肠道准备等判断过程的培训。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验