Hendrix C Russell, Housh Terry J, Johnson Glen O, Weir Joseph P, Beck Travis W, Malek Moh H, Mielke Michelle, Schmidt Richard J
Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0806, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Feb;105(3):333-42. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0895-3. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine if the mathematical model used for estimating the EMG(FT) during cycle ergometry was applicable to isometric muscle actions; and (2) to compare the mean torque level from the CF test to that of the EMG(FT) test. The CF was defined as the slope coefficient of the linear relationship between total "isometric work" (W (lim) in N m s) and time to exhaustion (T (lim)). The EMG(FT) was defined as the y-intercept of the isometric torque versus EMG fatigue curve slope coefficient relationship. There was a significant (p < 0.05) mean difference between CF (6.6 +/- 3.2 N m) and EMG(FT) (10.9 +/- 4.7 N m). The results of the present study suggested that, during isometric muscle actions of the forearm flexors, fatigue thresholds estimated from the W (lim) versus T (lim) relationship (CF) are different from those estimated from electromyographic fatigue curves (EMG(FT)).
(1)确定用于估计蹬车测力计时肌电图(FT)的数学模型是否适用于等长肌肉动作;(2)比较CF测试的平均扭矩水平与肌电图(FT)测试的平均扭矩水平。CF被定义为总“等长功”(W(lim),单位为N m s)与疲劳时间(T(lim))之间线性关系的斜率系数。EMG(FT)被定义为等长扭矩与肌电图疲劳曲线斜率系数关系的y轴截距。CF(6.6±3.2 N m)与EMG(FT)(10.9±4.7 N m)之间存在显著(p<0.05)的平均差异。本研究结果表明,在前臂屈肌的等长肌肉动作中,根据W(lim)与T(lim)关系(CF)估计的疲劳阈值与根据肌电图疲劳曲线(EMG(FT))估计的疲劳阈值不同。