Kärkkäinen Matti, Rikkonen Toni, Kröger Heikki, Sirola Joonas, Tuppurainen Marjo, Salovaara Kari, Arokoski Jari, Jurvelin Jukka, Honkanen Risto, Alhava Esko
Bone and Cartilage Research Unit, Clinical Research Center, University of Kuopio, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Bone. 2009 Apr;44(4):660-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.12.010. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
There is a need for cost-effective clinical methods to select women for bone densitometry. The aim of the present study was to determine whether relatively simple and clinically applicable physical tests could be useful in prediction of bone density in postmenopausal women.
A total of 606 women (age range 66-71 years) taking part in the population based OSTPRE Fracture Prevention Study were investigated. Spinal and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). Physical tests included the standing-on-one-foot (SOOF), grip strength (GS), leg extension strength, ability to squat down, standing 10 s eyes closed, chair rising, regular walk for 10 m and tandem walk for 6 m. All linear regression models were adjusted for age, body mass index, years on hormone therapy, years since menopause, current smoking and use of oral glucocorticoids.
The SOOF was associated with lumbar spine BMD (r2=0.16, p=0.004) and the femoral regions (r2 values from 0.17 to 0.23 and p-values all<0.001). The GS was associated with lumbar spine BMD (r2=0.16, p=0.011) and the femoral regions (r2 values from 0.16 to 0.21 and p-values from <0.001 to 0.004). The ability to squat down on the floor was associated with the femoral regions (r2 values from 0.15 to 0.21 and p-values from 0.028 to 0.040). In addition, functional capacity was decreased in women with femoral neck osteoporosis (WHO classification) compared to women with normal or osteopenic BMD: SOOF -39% (p=0.001), GS -18% (p<0.001), leg extension strength -19% (p=0.007) and ability to squat down on the floor -40% (p=0.004). For osteoporosis prediction (ROC analysis) a threshold of a 22 kg in GS would yield a true-positive rate (sensitivity) of about 58% and a true-negative rate (specificity) of 86% (AUC 0.76).
We suggest that grip strength could be used in medical decision making to identify those women who would benefit from BMD measurements albeit alone it may not provide accurate enough tool for osteoporosis screening.
需要有经济有效的临床方法来挑选适合进行骨密度测定的女性。本研究的目的是确定相对简单且临床适用的体格检查是否有助于预测绝经后女性的骨密度。
对参与基于人群的OSTPRE骨折预防研究的606名女性(年龄范围66 - 71岁)进行了调查。采用双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量脊柱和股骨的骨矿物质密度(BMD)。体格检查包括单脚站立(SOOF)、握力(GS)、腿部伸展力量、下蹲能力、闭眼站立10秒、从椅子上起身、正常行走10米和前后脚交替行走6米。所有线性回归模型均针对年龄、体重指数、激素治疗年限、绝经年限、当前吸烟情况和口服糖皮质激素的使用情况进行了调整。
单脚站立与腰椎骨密度相关(r2 = 0.16,p = 0.004)以及与股骨各区域相关(r2值从0.17至0.23,p值均<0.001)。握力与腰椎骨密度相关(r2 = 0.16,p = 0.011)以及与股骨各区域相关(r2值从0.16至0.21,p值从<0.001至0.004)。在地板上蹲下的能力与股骨各区域相关(r2值从0.15至0.21,p值从0.028至0.040)。此外,与骨密度正常或骨量减少的女性相比,股骨颈骨质疏松(WHO分类)女性的功能能力下降:单脚站立下降39%(p = 0.001),握力下降18%(p<0.001),腿部伸展力量下降19%(p = 0.007),在地板上蹲下的能力下降40%(p = 0.004)。对于骨质疏松预测(ROC分析),握力阈值为22千克时,真阳性率(敏感性)约为58%,真阴性率(特异性)为86%(AUC 0.76)。
我们建议握力可用于医疗决策,以识别那些将从骨密度测量中受益的女性,尽管仅凭握力可能无法提供足够准确的骨质疏松筛查工具。