Suppr超能文献

在尸体颈椎不稳定模型中比较不同头环装置下颈椎的活动情况。

Comparing cervical spine motion with different halo devices in a cadaveric cervical instability model.

作者信息

DiPaola Christian P, Sawers Andrew, Conrad Bryan P, Horodyski MaryBeth, DiPaola Matthew J, Del Rossi Gianluca, Rechtine Glenn R

机构信息

University of British Columbia, Department of Orthopaedics, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 15;34(2):149-55. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181920e7c.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical evaluation of conventional and noninvasive halos in cadaveric C1-C2 and C5-C6 instability models.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the ability of a conventional halo and noninvasive halo (NIH) to immobilize the unstable cervical spine at the C1-C2 and C5-C6 levels.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many successful outcomes have been reported in cervical spine injury treatment with the conventional halo (CH); however, complications related to pin sites have been reported. The NIH was designed to overcome these complications. To date, no investigation has compared the biomechanical efficacy of the NIH with that of the CH in restricting three-dimensional cervical spine motion.

METHODS

A global instability was created at the C1-C2 level in 4 cadavers and at C5-C6 in 4 others. Relative motion was measured between the superior and inferior vertebrae during the donning process, execution of the log roll technique, and during the process of sitting up. This testing sequence was followed for all treatment conditions.

RESULTS

During the application of the orthoses there was a significant increase in motion at C1-C2 instability and a trend toward increased motion at the C5-C6 instability with CH compared with NIH. In the log roll maneuver, the CH and NIH restrict motion to a similar degree at the C1-C2 instability level, except in frontal plane translation, where CH immobilizes the segment to a greater extent. For the C5-C6 instability the CH provides significantly better immobilization for lateral bending and axial translation. No significant differences were found between the NIH and CH for the sit-up maneuver at either of the levels.

CONCLUSION

Donning of the NIH generates significantly less cervical spine motion than application of the CH. The CH provides superior immobilization for a C5-C6 instability during the log roll maneuver and a C1-C2 instability in the frontal plane during the log-roll maneuver. The CH and NIH immobilize the C1-C2 and C5-C6 instability to a similar degree during the sit-up maneuver.

摘要

研究设计

在尸体C1 - C2和C5 - C6不稳定模型中对传统头环和无创头环进行生物力学评估。

目的

比较传统头环和无创头环(NIH)在C1 - C2和C5 - C6水平固定不稳定颈椎的能力。

背景数据总结

使用传统头环(CH)治疗颈椎损伤已报道了许多成功的结果;然而,也有与针道相关并发症的报道。无创头环旨在克服这些并发症。迄今为止,尚无研究比较无创头环与传统头环在限制颈椎三维运动方面的生物力学效果。

方法

在4具尸体的C1 - C2水平以及另外4具尸体的C5 - C6水平造成整体不稳定。在佩戴过程、执行翻身技术过程以及坐起过程中测量上位和下位椎体之间的相对运动。所有治疗条件均遵循此测试顺序。

结果

与无创头环相比,在应用矫形器期间,C1 - C2不稳定时传统头环导致的运动显著增加,C5 - C6不稳定时传统头环导致的运动有增加趋势。在翻身动作中,在C1 - C2不稳定水平,传统头环和无创头环限制运动的程度相似,但在额面平移方面,传统头环对节段的固定程度更高。对于C5 - C6不稳定,传统头环在侧方弯曲和轴向平移方面提供了明显更好的固定效果。在任何一个水平的坐起动作中,无创头环和传统头环之间均未发现显著差异。

结论

佩戴无创头环比佩戴传统头环产生的颈椎运动显著更少。在翻身动作期间,传统头环为C5 - C6不稳定以及在翻身动作期间为C1 - C2不稳定在额面提供了更好的固定效果。在坐起动作期间,传统头环和无创头环对C1 - C2和C5 - C6不稳定固定程度相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验