Vogels H D E, Bruijnen C J P, Beasley S W, Blakelock R T, Maoate K
Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Mar;25(3):229-33. doi: 10.1007/s00383-008-2310-x. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
The indication for contralateral exploration in patients with a unilateral inguinal hernia and the implications of a contralateral patent processus vaginalis have been the subject of much debate during recent decades. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the size and side of the hernial sac on the side of presentation are predictive for the operative appearance of the processus vaginalis/hernial sac on the contralateral side.
All primary herniotomies performed by the Christchurch-based paediatric surgical service were reviewed. Patients who developed a contralateral hernia after unilateral repair were identified. In a random subset of patients who had bilateral exploration for unilateral hernias, the size of the clinical hernial sac was plotted against the size of the contralateral patent processus vaginalis/hernial sac (when present) as assessed at the time of open surgery.
Overall, 2,124 unique patients underwent herniotomies in the period reviewed, and 44 (3.8%) metachronous contralateral hernias were identified. Girls were not at greater risk than boys of developing a metachronous hernia. There was a positive correlation between the size of the clinical hernial sac and the size of the contralateral processus vaginalis/hernial sac. There was no significant relationship between the original presenting side and the development of a metachronous contralateral hernia.
It is not possible to predict reliably which patients who present with a unilateral hernia would benefit from bilateral exploration, although the size of the hernia has a positive correlation with the size of the contralateral processus vaginalis/hernial sac. Those with "massive" hernias on the presenting side were more likely to have "large" contralateral hernial sacs, but how many of these would subsequently become symptomatic remains uncertain.
近几十年来,单侧腹股沟疝患者对侧探查的指征以及对侧鞘突未闭的影响一直是诸多争论的焦点。本研究的目的是调查就诊侧疝囊的大小和部位是否可预测对侧鞘突/疝囊的手术表现。
回顾了基督城小儿外科服务部门进行的所有原发性疝修补术。确定了单侧修补术后发生对侧疝的患者。在因单侧疝接受双侧探查的患者的随机子集中,将临床疝囊的大小与开放手术时评估的对侧鞘突未闭/疝囊(若存在)的大小进行对比。
总体而言,在所回顾的时期内,2124例独特患者接受了疝修补术,其中44例(3.8%)被确定为异时性对侧疝。女孩发生异时性疝的风险并不高于男孩。临床疝囊大小与对侧鞘突/疝囊大小之间存在正相关。原就诊侧与异时性对侧疝的发生之间无显著关系。
虽然疝的大小与对侧鞘突/疝囊的大小呈正相关,但无法可靠地预测哪些单侧疝患者会从双侧探查中获益。就诊侧有“巨大”疝的患者更可能有“大”的对侧疝囊,但其中有多少随后会出现症状仍不确定。