Suppr超能文献

钟表绘制测试:低教育水平老年人的表现。

The Clock Drawing Test: performance among elderly with low educational level.

作者信息

Lourenço Roberto Alves, Ribeiro-Filho Sergio Telles, Moreira Irene de Freitas Henriques, Paradela Emylucy Martins Paiva, Miranda Aline Sobral de

机构信息

Internal Medicine Department, Medical Sciences School, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;30(4):309-15. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462008000400002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of four scales, and to determine the inter-rater reliability and the influence of schooling on Clock Drawing Test performance in screening for dementia in elderly with low educational level.

DESIGN

Criterion validation, concurrent type.

SETTING

Outpatient unit of Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Hospital, Brazil.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 306 individuals (> or = 65 years) were assessed by a geriatrician and a neuropsychologist using functional and cognitive instruments. The diagnosis of dementia was established by consensus in a meeting between these professionals. Four different researchers blinded as to the cognitive status of the patients scored the Clock Drawing Test using Shulman's, Sunderland's, Manos', and Wolf-Klein's methods; and a fifth researcher assessed Manos' method for an inter-rater reliability study.

RESULTS

The data of 211 individuals (< or = 4 years of schooling) were analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity of the four methods were similar (about 65%). The inter-rater reliability of Manos' method was excellent (ICC = 0.944). The areas under the ROC curves were small (0.657 to 0.681), and the differences between them were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The Clock Drawing Test is a reliable but not valid test to screen for dementia in older outpatients with 4 or less years of formal schooling.

摘要

目的

比较四种量表的准确性,确定评分者间信度以及受教育程度对简易精神状态检查表(Clock Drawing Test)在低教育水平老年人痴呆筛查中表现的影响。

设计

标准效度验证,并行类型。

地点

巴西里约热内卢州立大学医院门诊部。

参与者

共有306名年龄≥65岁的个体由一名老年病科医生和一名神经心理学家使用功能和认知工具进行评估。这些专业人员在一次会议上通过共识确定痴呆的诊断。四名对患者认知状态不知情的不同研究人员使用舒尔曼(Shulman)、桑德兰(Sunderland)、马诺斯(Manos)和沃尔夫 - 克莱因(Wolf - Klein)的方法对简易精神状态检查表进行评分;第五名研究人员评估马诺斯方法以进行评分者间信度研究。

结果

分析了211名受教育年限≤4年个体的数据。四种方法的敏感性和特异性相似(约65%)。马诺斯方法的评分者间信度极佳(组内相关系数ICC = 0.944)。ROC曲线下面积较小(0.657至0.681),且它们之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

简易精神状态检查表对于受正规教育年限为4年或以下的老年门诊患者痴呆筛查而言是一项可靠但无效的测试。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验