Scholze Alexandra, Thies Christina, Cheikhalfraj Mohamed, Wittstock Antje, Pommer Wolfgang, Zidek Walter, Tepel Martin
Medizinische Klinik, Nephrologie, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Am J Nephrol. 2009;29(6):598-606. doi: 10.1159/000193145. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
We determined whether attainment of classical clinical performance measures for hemodialysis care improves survival in hemodialysis patients with increased arterial stiffness.
We performed a prospective cohort study of 538 hemodialysis patients with a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range 8-30). Arterial stiffness was measured using applanation tonometry. Clinical performance measure targets were hemoglobin value >or=110 g/l, serum albumin value >or=37 g/l and measured single-pool Kt/V urea value >or=1.2.
During follow-up, 217 patients (40%) died. In non-survivors, arterial stiffness of large arteries (S1) was significantly higher compared with survivors (p = 0.0002). An analysis of hemodialysis patients who were alive 18 months after inclusion into the study showed that survival was significantly longer in those patients that met >or=2 clinical performance measure targets compared with patients that met <or=1 target (chi(2) 4.13; p = 0.04). Better attainment of classical clinical performance measures showed a 54% mortality risk reduction.
S1 predicted mortality in hemodialysis patients. However, better attainment of classical clinical performance measures significantly improved long-term outcome in hemodialysis patients despite their pronounced increase in arterial stiffness.