Akers Timothy A, Lanier Mark M
Office of Research, School of Community Health and Policy, Morgan State University, 1130 E Cold Springs Lane, Portage Building, Baltimore, MD 21239, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):397-402. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.139808. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
Members of the public health and criminal justice disciplines often work with marginalized populations: people at high risk of drug use, health problems, incarceration, and other difficulties. As these fields increasingly overlap, distinctions between them are blurred, as numerous research reports and funding trends document. However, explicit theoretical and methodological linkages between the 2 disciplines remain rare. A new paradigm that links methods and statistical models of public health with those of their criminal justice counterparts is needed, as are increased linkages between epidemiological analogies, theories, and models and the corresponding tools of criminology. We outline disciplinary commonalities and distinctions, present policy examples that integrate similarities, and propose "epidemiological criminology" as a bridging framework.
这些人面临药物使用、健康问题、监禁及其他困境的高风险。正如众多研究报告和资金趋势所表明的那样,随着这些领域的重叠日益增加,它们之间的区别变得模糊不清。然而,这两个学科之间明确的理论和方法联系仍然很少见。需要一种新的范式,将公共卫生的方法和统计模型与其刑事司法领域的对应方法和模型联系起来,同时也需要加强流行病学类比、理论和模型与犯罪学相应工具之间的联系。我们概述了学科的共性和差异,给出了整合相似之处的政策实例,并提出“流行病学犯罪学”作为一个桥梁框架。